Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batul Soltani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 19:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Batul Soltani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim made for being an Iranian politician, but all I could find was this source that describes her as a MOIS employee. Devotes herself to writing against political opposition group MEK, which seems to be a tactical effort to discredit political opposition groups. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the sourcing is mainly primary, that is things she wrote, that does not show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Daask (talk) 19:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this person meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL, the two applicable thresholds. Vanamonde (talk) 08:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete – While officeholding politicians are almost always notable, there is no sourcing that proves she is. If that can be found before deletion, then I'm in favor of keeping. If not, then delete. Redditaddict69 14:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.