Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagh-e Hajji Abdol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bagh-e Hajji Abdol

Bagh-e Hajji Abdol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this village even exists. Google turns up nothing but Wikipedia mirrors. Adam9007 (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — As far as I can tell, it exists, but it's just a farm, not a village. The name means "Hajji Abdol's garden", and this database explicitly calls it a farm. (Click on the green bar, then copy+paste the Persian name into the searchbar.) The Iranian census document linked to in the article does indeed call Bagh-e Hajji Abdol a village, but given that there are other "villages" listed in the same county with names translating to "gas station", "cement factory", and "peasant chicken slaughterhouse", it seems that the census takers were taking note of pretty much any building they came across. Which is pretty cool, but it doesn't mean we need an article for every one of them. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.