Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associate in Music, University of Adelaide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect may be created at editorial discretion. T. Canens (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Associate in Music, University of Adelaide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short stub page with no references and lack of notability. Search online reveals little notable material of which is already covered by the article Associate in Music, Australia. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The "Associate in Music", initially a Diploma awarded by the University of Adelaide's Elder Conservatorium of Music is unrelated to the "Associate in Music, Australia" (AMusA) Pdfpdf (talk) 08:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Search online reveals little notable material of which is already covered by the article Associate in Music, Australia. - Nonsense. There are several notable articles which are unrelated to AMusA. e.g. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/press/titles/faculty-arts/arts-ebook.pdf page 327: "Thus the provision of both theoretical and practical studies of music became a reality at the University, although initially this was through the diploma course entitled 'Associate in Music', which was introduced in 1900." Pdfpdf (talk) 08:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Yes, it's a stub and needs further expansion, but I think I've addressed the nominator's concerns. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very rarely is a partifular degree given by a particular university notable enough to have a seperate article, I see no reason why this would be an exception to that rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no independent sources are provided to support notability related to this particular degree.--Rpclod (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly not notable. Having degrees on every degree issued by every university is excessive, and there are no references that suggest this degree is notable in any way. the Australian Dictionary of Biography entries don't use the acronym in the title or suggest the program is special in any way. If the term wasn't so awkward, a redirect to Elder Conservatorium of Music would be reasonable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion - Change to redirect to Elder Conservatorium of Music#Associate in Music, University of Adelaide Pdfpdf (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No viable arguments or significant-coverage independent citations put forth as to why this might have any significant independent notability. SunChaser (talk) 11:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom মাখামাখি (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does anyone have a problem with me changing it to a redirect to Elder Conservatorium of Music#Associate in Music, University of Adelaide and closing the discussion? Pdfpdf (talk) 08:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On a procedural level, probably best not to when you're an involved contributor to the discussion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.