Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist Vs Poet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artist Vs Poet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artticle does not assert a claim to notability. They have not had any songs that have made the charts, any records on a major label, any coverage by non-trivial sources, nor any members of the band in other notable bands. The article has previously been deleted due to a lack of credible information from reliable sources and currently stands almost completely on the band's own website. Mrathel (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 17:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is a review of an album. Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 23:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The group is signed to a notable indie label but have only released a non-charting EP, and simply being signed to that label does not cause the band to pass WP:MUSIC alone. I might change my vote if I see any reliable sources to the band's notability, but I haven't found any whatsoever. Doc Strange (talk) 05:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.