Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabs in Finland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet and in the absence of any other arguments for deletion, I’m closing as ‘keep’. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arabs in Finland

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~No reference, encyclopedic value. Fails WP:GNG. Pollock's (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)~~ Striking nomination by sockpuppet: WP:SOCKSTRIKE --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can I ask if you did WP:BEFORE? Immigration of others to countries like Finland is definitely an easily-sourceable topic where statistics can bare-minimum source this article (a search for "arabic finlanders" found this for instance to support the language count claim). It feels like this article is underwritten and all it needs is some more sources. Nate • (chatter) 22:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The lack of WP:BEFORE extends to not even looking in the article itself. It does indeed have a source for the number of Arabic speakers, which is the only actual fact in the article. SpinningSpark 23:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. See "‘Finland’s no good:’ Disappointed migrants turn back", Arab News; "Thousands of Iraqi refugees leave Finland voluntarily", Reuters. SpinningSpark 17:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep source in the article, with those found by others here and in a quick search shows that this easily passes GNG. LittlePuppers (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Immigration to Finland if only listed source can be rescued. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 01:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:GNG. Per sourcing. Google search gives plenty of useful results as well for expansion.BabbaQ (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep generaly support keep reasons above. Fairly new with expansion, similar to a set of articles "ethnic group in country". Potential for merge options by grouping ethic group or by a set of countries, but possibility best to delay merge until various articles stable, no need to rush a merge.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.