Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Moule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Moule

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely scrapes past WP:NFOOTY with one substitute appearance in a fully professional league, but can't find any evidence of him playing football at any level at all otherwise. Absolutely no significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Jellyman (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jellyman (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only one sub and per the article " It is unknown what happened to Moule after this." Lacks significant coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Squeaks past NFOOTY but clearly fails GNG. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or redirect to 1994–95 Dundee United F.C. season. Giant Snowman 18:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He meets NFootball (just), but lacks notability. I recall he got a bit of coverage at the time as a young player making his debut for Dundee United in the top flight. However he never appeared for the first team again (not even the following season in the Challenge Cup when several other young players made one or two appearances). There seems to be an Andy Moule who played in the Juniors for Culter F.C. later in the 1990s, but I have no idea if it is the same individual and in any case would not help make a case for him being notable. I think this is a fairly clear cut case if we are going to avoid having every footballer who played for a few minutes in a top division game having an article. Dunarc (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the reasons given above. I am not sure if he is a plausible enough search term to require a redirect either. RobinCarmody (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.