Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ade Olufeko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged with Visual Collaborative. —Dark 05:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ade Olufeko

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG. This was a Articles for Creation submission that I declined because of lacking substantial sources, and to my surprise another editor accepted it, though uncorrected. I do not think the subject meets the notability guidelines. Only one of the source is directly about the subject, and it is hosted on examiner.com, e.g. a user-generated content platform, not RS. The other sources are about Visual Collaborative, not Ade Olufeko. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 18:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note there's a duplicate of this page at Visual Collaborative, so both would need to be deleted if consensus says so. If this ends with a keep perhaps the Ade Olufeko article could redirect to the other, as the other has a better-fitting title. Them From Space 03:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The original authors indicated the intended article is Visual Collaborative, so this article may be deleted. Thorncrag 04:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have tagged the article as a G7 per author's request in IRC. Shearonink (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note Both article content contributors have indicated the article was mistaken and expressed a desire to have it deleted. Thorncrag 05:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.