Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 SAFF Championship Final

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Obvious keep is obvious. (non-admin closure) — Jkudlick ^tc_s 00:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 SAFF Championship Final (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary to have an article for an insignificant tournament final. Can be merged with the main article. The information is already summarized in the main article 2015 SAFF Championship. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The final is for a tournament that is recognized under FIFA and the AFC. It is standard-practice to have articles of the final of football tournaments such as this in which senior international sides are pitted against each other, which this is, just for nations in South Asia. I also believe this match will pass WP:GNG, article was created with date and venue decided. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Totally agree with ArsenalFan700. For removing queries, see the previous finals like this one. — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 20:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per ArsenalFan700 Seasider91 (talk) 23:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Inter&anthro (talk) 01:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: its a official tournament recognized by FIFA and AFC so needs to stay. totally agree with ArsenalFan700 (Goalkeepar (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]
• Keep as above. GiantSnowman 09:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per ArsenalFan700 Debarghya89 (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Swastik has nailed the point of keeping this article.Suman420 (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.