Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Bangladesh Premier League player auction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Bangladesh Premier League player auction

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This is in direct breach of WP:IINFO and has multiple issues. If not to be deleted, then please to merge into 2015 Bangladesh Premier League. The same is applying to 2012 Bangladesh Premier League player auction and 2013 Bangladesh Premier League player auction which are both also in breach of WP:IINFO, again to be deleted or alternatively merging into respectively 2012 Bangladesh Premier League and 2013 Bangladesh Premier League. Thank you. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 14:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It is seeming to me that this discussion ending in deletion is setting a precedent here. Very similar in using statistics only and in breaching WP:IINFO. Thank you. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 10:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:GNG, a quick search shows enough sources for a standalone article: [1], [2], [3], more out there... --Zayeem ^(talk) 00:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be a notable event in Bangladesh, covered in reliable sources per User:Zayeem. ----Steve Quinn (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.