Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 St. Norbert Green Knights football team (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While there are an equal number of "votes", the deletion ones make much stronger arguments, with one noting notability issues and the other noting lack of referencing to create that notability. The keep ones, meanwhile, are essentially "because there was an afd" and "just tag it instead", which are not compelling reasons to keep the article. Wizardman 18:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2007 St. Norbert Green Knights football team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See first nomination. Non-notable sports season, per WP:ROUTINE and WP:CFBSEASON. Edge3 (talk) 11:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per failed first nomination. What is this, "If At First You Don't Succeed, Try, Try Again?" Ejgreen77 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus was reached on the first nomination, and the closing admin allowed renomination. Edge3 (talk) 07:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Edge is correct. There is no problem in bringing up the AFD again for further discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I like the enthusiasm, but I don't like the incompleteness of the article. With only one source, I think the encyclopedia would be better served by merging to the a conference season article where more sources can be combined. Beef up the article and I'll change my position.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article needs maintenance tagging like Template:Expand article if you think that it's that bad. I disagree with Paul's comment about merging into a conference article being the appropriate avenue. If merged, the content would be more appropriate in the St. Norbert Green Knights football article. Royal broil 01:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Change my mind, I'm easy.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.