User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 61
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | → | Archive 65 |
December 2011
Unfortunately, i do not view Wikipedia as an oligarchy, where the minority can trump the majority. spoilers are allowed, but whatever. I changed the picture. And NEVER accuse me of something i'm not. RAP (talk) 14:17 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, i'm certainly not an newt. RAP (talk) 0:44 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- So much for using your eyeballs in a spell, then. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 12:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I think you put something into MiszaBot's milk, he's gone crazy.
Poor MiszaBot has gone berserk, but don't worry, it's just on three pages. He's deleting instead of archiving. I traced it back, I think. Did you change the templates on wikiproject journalism, media or Portugal ? well, not Portugal, some IP did that one I think. Apparently Misza's config can be subtly altered into a time bomb, you did that by accident, and when he returned to the page, he deleted his programming and went on a rampage. Anyhow, delighted if you could clean up the mess, I'll try and do Portugal. I'm very tired right now. Penyulap talk 22:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, please hassle me on my talkpage rather than here. Penyulap talk 22:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Notability-section
A tag has been placed on Template:Notability-section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- No such TfD; I see you self-reverted, immediately, so I assume it was an error or a mind-changing. Thanks for the notice, though. I certainly would have commented at the TfD if it had been a real one. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 00:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)