User talk:Little Mountain 5/Archive 9

Nice work on expanding the article. Finetooth (talk) 21:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! There's not too much to go on, so I'm trying to find some more information for it... :) LittleMountain5 22:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the recent article, thought he was blanking it as vadalism (Huggle.) Ryou Hashimoto (talk) 22:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine, I've been known to do that too. :) LittleMountain5 22:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Sterlingville, Oregon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Saalstin (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied here. LittleMountain5 23:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

On July 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Applegate River, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nice work! Thanks for all you do for Southern Oregon. Katr67 (talk) 20:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Same to you for all the work you're doing up there. :) LittleMountain5 20:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I could not find the information about the article and its DYK. Thanks Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

It was removed from the nominations page. This was the last revision of the discussion, at the very bottom. Thanks, LittleMountain5 22:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

The 28th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.

I've responded regarding Template_talk:Did_you_know#Joel_Weisman.2C_Morbidity_and_Mortality_Weekly_Report and neither article has tagged as a stub since before they were nominated. Alansohn (talk) 02:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

MMWR was classified as a stub on its talk page, but it was fixed and is currently in prep area 1. Thanks, LittleMountain5 15:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

		The Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence
		For your recent timely report of an error made by xenobot during task 6.1, I award you the Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence in bug squashing efforts. Thank you for catching this error so quickly! –xenotalk 14:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, no problem! :) LittleMountain5 14:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

By the way, if you haven't already, I can hardcode those non-stub categories on the members if you want. –xeno^talk 14:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

No, I haven't got to it yet. Feel free to do it if you want to, otherwise I'll get to them later today sometime. Thanks, LittleMountain5 15:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

You should consider installing WP:HOTCAT for tasks like these. (Can be enabled as a gadget in prefs). –xeno^talk 15:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll check it out, thanks! LittleMountain5 15:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done

Howdy after a long message absence to those of WikiProject Oregon. To answer a common question, no you did not get removed from the COTW notification list, I was just too busy to send out the notification for the last change. So, thank you to all those who helped improve Central Oregon and Mount Jefferson, as well as those who added infoboxes and adopted a governor. For this edition of the COTW, we have partly by request and in honor of the return of college football, Duck football and Beaver football. If you are a fan of neither, maybe go back and work on a governor or add infoboxes this time around. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

		The COTW award from WPOR.
		Thanks for leading the way in last week's Collaboration of the Week! For your work improving Mount Jefferson, keep up the good work. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, although I didn't do too much... :) LittleMountain5 15:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Little Mountain 5, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Thanks :) LittleMountain5 16:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Mostly right, but there's a few odd ones in there... LittleMountain5 16:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For tireless work on improving both Upper and Lower Table Rock and Roxy Ann Peak to Good Article status. ZabMilenko 03:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey! I was planning on giving you one... but you beat me to it! Thanks for the barnstar and all the work you've put into the articles. :) LittleMountain5 14:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll second that, is this your first GA? Very impressive :) -Pete (talk) 23:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see you already got Roxy Ann Peak to GA…missed that one. Well anyway, keep up the good work! -Pete (talk) 23:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, although Zab deserves at least half the credit. :) LittleMountain5 01:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Its nice seeing you again! :)Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 17:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

You too! I was just doing a little TPSing... :P LittleMountain5 17:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Little Mountain 5, and thanks for your interest in igloo. Before using the program, please read the following information carefully - failure to do so may result in your test access being revoked.

igloo is a JavaScript-powered, browser-based anti-vandalism tool, which means you do not have to download or install anything on your computer and it will work on multiple operating systems. However, it does mean that the performance relies on that of your browser and it may operate more slowly than downloaded programs. You must have either Mozilla Firefox 3+ or Google Chrome to use igloo, as it is currently incompatible with other browsers.

igloo relies on a system called iglooNet to assist you in finding and reverting vandalism. It is this system that transforms the program from a pretty version of recent changes to an actual anti-vandalism tool. Naturally, this is beyond the power of a client-side program, and igloo will regularly communicate with an external, non-Wikimedia server. Because of things like server logs, and the iglooNet abuse tracker, this may allow your IP address to be attached to your username - something which is otherwise impossible on Wikipedia. If you do not want this to happen, you MUST NOT USE IGLOO.

If you decide that you do want to test igloo, please keep in mind that it not wholly stable, and you may experience problems where it performs an invalid edit, or other unwanted action. If this happens, fix any mistakes you've made, apologise to anyone you've offended, and let me know. I don't take any responsibility for your use of the program - if you aren't willing to fix any errors, don't use it.

igloo is already quite powerful. The following is a simple guide to using the program:

• The igloo interface is similar to that of other software, including huggle. Recent changes appear on the left, and diffs appear on the right.
• igloo sorts diffs based on iglooNet data so that edits most likely to be vandalism are displayed first. You can press spacebar to view the top diff, or click on any diff to view it directly.
• When you find vandalism, press 'Q' or click the revert button to revert the change, and issue a warning to the user. igloo automatically issues the correct warning. It will ignore existing warnings that are more than 5 days old, and restart from the beginning.
• The iglooNet assertion system tags clean and dirty edits with colour coding - if it suspects an edit is vandalism, it will be flagged as red, and if it believes it to be clean, it will tag it green.

I just noticed this pic and it's really cool! Cheers, Katr67 (talk) 21:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I think it's actually neater in real life than on camera though. :) LittleMountain5 23:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use automated tools indiscriminately, as you did here, restoring vandalism. You are responsible for your edits made with automated tools, which can be removed if abused. ↪REDVERS ^{The internet is for porn} 14:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I'm helping to test a new automated tool named igloo, and all the kinks aren't worked out yet. I assure you that reverting the reverter was not what I intended to do. I realized what happened, and tried to revert myself, but found that you beat me to it. Again, I apologize for the mistake. Thanks for your concern, LittleMountain5 23:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I will be glad to look at it again, but it may take me a day or two. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Great, thanks! LittleMountain5 15:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I started some info about the Deer Ridge Fire over there at Roxy Ann Peak. Its about 9pm and I am stuck at work with no camera. It is a long shot, but if you can see the mountain from where you are could you try and grab a snapshot of the fire spots? It would be an unusual picture to have. (/me kicks himself again for not bringing his camera). ZabMilenko 03:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I got several pictures of it, but none with actual flames. I have some better, unobstructed pictures on my phone (one with the Prescott Park sign in it), that I might be able to upload later. (I was kicking myself for going up to Prescott Park without my camera). The fire department says it's burned over 600 acres so far, but they've got it mostly contained. LittleMountain5 14:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I spent a couple seasons as a wildland firefighter (once in your neck of the woods, pun unintended), and alas I don't think you'll be able to get pictures of the flames unless the thing really blows up. I don't think you want that, although flames are awesome. </pyromania> Though it's unlikely my friend who was my former crew boss went out on this particular fire, I'll check just in case they have some better pics. Stay safe! Katr67 (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, he might have, I heard people all the way from Bend showed up at this fire! Thankfully, its out now. (Although it looks like half the mountain burned down). Thanks, LittleMountain5 23:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Of course, thankfully nobody was hurt either. I will be heading up myself probably Thursday to see what I can take pictures of, if I can. Is Prescott Park open to the public right now? ZabMilenko 11:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I think it is, but I'm not sure. LittleMountain5 14:20, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Just out of curiosity, have you ever considered running for adminship? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I've been considering it for a while now, but with the current standards, I doubt I would pass. What do you think? Thanks, LittleMountain5 23:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)