User talk:Little Mountain 5/Archive 16

• As a listed DYK participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions00:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

FYI, Wikipedia_talk:Four_Award#Impending_rule_change.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 06:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Please confirm my assessment of Martin Keamy and Tropical Storm Brenda (1960).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

If I understand the new rule correctly, both should still be fine, because they were nominated at DYK before their GANs passed. LittleMountain5 16:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I see Keamy GA pass time is 19:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC) at Talk:Martin Keamy/GA1. A mouseover pointed to this edit at 04:40, 3 July 2008. On closer inspection, I see that this earlier edit at 0:26, 29 June 2008 means we are all good.

I see Brenda's GA pass time is 19:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC) at Talk:Tropical Storm Brenda (1960)/GA1 and Brenda's nom 21:39, 5 January 2010. I think when I did the mouseover on the preview button for this diff it looked like 9 January instead of 5.

Apologies. Trying to rip through 75 of these, I took some shortcuts using mouseovers so I did not have to wait for pages to load. It looks like we won't lose any FOURs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 20:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I am just realizing that some of my WP:CHICOTW work should have been evaluated for collaborators. I initially nominated them considering only my own work, but of course have never reviewed them myself. It is likely that reviewers did not evaluate possible collaborators for FOUR consideration at both Chicago Board of Trade Building and South Side, Chicago. The latter would just be for recordkeeping since it has been delisted.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 00:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

You never gave me your opinion of my collaborators on the above. Also, for the record, can you give me an opinion on whether involvement was heavy enough in No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF for FOUR recognition.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Chicago Board of Trade Building: LurkingInChicago (talk · contribs) should definitely receive FOUR credit, because he created the first encyclopedic content, wrote the vast majority of the article, and was active in all four stages of development (less so at FAC, but I think his contributions there were significant enough for consideration).

South Side, Chicago: I'm not sure if Speciate (talk · contribs) was involved enough in the later stages of the article's development to receive FOUR credit. (Assuming the article ever regains its FA status.)

No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF: I don't think Nick-D (talk · contribs) was involved enough to meet FOUR's DYK, GA, or FA criteria. LittleMountain5 16:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Nice job on List of longest streams of Idaho, which has been promoted to Featured List. Finetooth (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! And thanks again for your suggestions and support. Cheers, LittleMountain5 20:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Oregon rivers
Thank you for quality articles on Oregon's rivers, such as Little Butte Creek, looking at the related history and people, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (5 July 2008)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 267th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Cheers, LittleMountain5 19:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

This might have fooled a few people and cut down on the drama generated for a bit. --GraemeL ^(talk) 21:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Haha, no kidding. ;-) LittleMountain5 21:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

The content was deleted because the information you posted (copied from older sources and not your own research) regarding Dinacoma is not up to date/accurate. I am in the process of revising the genus and there have been some taxonomic changes that you are not aware of. I'm open to new taxonomic and morphological information if you have any to contribute? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.234.183.121 (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

If you would like to remove the current paragraph and replace it with more recent/accurate information, please feel free to do so, provided that you have a verifiable source to back it up—Wikipedia does not accept original research. Also, I did not write the article (and indeed know very little about this particular beetle), so please contact the main author, Melchoir (talk · contribs), or post on the article's talk page regarding any perceived factual inaccuracies. Cheers, LittleMountain5 00:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I've never thought about the problem you've pointed out. Does the entire sandbox history automatically tag along every time I create a new article in a sandbox and then move it to mainspace? If so, I may have done this 200 times, not sure. Should I be doing something different? Finetooth (talk) 23:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh, it probably only happens during a "move" rather than when I use cut-and-paste. So maybe the other 199 creations did not have this problem? Finetooth (talk) 23:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the edit history only moves when the page is moved, not when it is cut-and-pasted. So if the sandbox is new and the entire history is relevant to the article, moving is great. But if the sandbox is older and has a long history, all those old edits will come along with it, so it's better to cut-and-paste. It's really not too big of a problem—just a little confusing for anyone looking at the page history. (As it stands, the Mexico list appears to have over 5,000 revisions!) Cheers, LittleMountain5 00:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing this and seeking a remedy. Finetooth (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem. The list's history is fixed, but due to the difficulty of the request, the other edits are now at User:Finetooth/George Washington Weidler, User:Finetooth/South Fork Clackamas River, and User:Finetooth/Sandbox6. Sorry about that; do whatever you want with them. LittleMountain5 16:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

	WIKI LOVES LIBRARIES 2013! You are invited to attend the upcoming "Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon. The event will be held from 2:30–4:30pm on Sunday, November 17, 2013 at the Vancouver Community Library (901 C Street) in Vancouver, Washington. The edit-athon will focus on creating and expanding articles related to Vancouver and Clark County. Details and signup here!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of WikiProjectOregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Little_Mountain_5! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:

• Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
• Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

Thanks for getting that, Little Mountain. May I ask, where did you see the request? Is User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable on your watchlist? --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 07:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem! Yes, TPERTable is on my watchlist and I also just added it to my user page earlier today. If there are any other templates that need fixing, let me know. LittleMountain5 07:40, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info; nice to know the new system (template-protected requests, I mean) is working. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 07:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

The edit on the BJ Upton page may seem inappropriate, however, it is correct. Records show that Upton had been acting as a pimp for the baseball team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.175.16 (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy: "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source [...] Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." LittleMountain5 23:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

This month, WikiProject Oregon features two photo campaigns:

• PDX Pods
• Christmas in Oregon

The concept is simple: upload photos of these two topics and share your work! Whether you upload one or one hundred, these images will help capture the culture of our state and illustrate Wikimedia projects. Have fun, and happy holiday season!You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of WikiProject Oregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered on behalf of Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)