User talk:Kintetsubuffalo/Archive 11
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Thanks for uploading File:Associação dos Escuteiros de Cabo Verde.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am not able to check my email, but I believe you were asking for help moving a file at commons. to move files at commons you should follow the instructions at commons. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your request(s) has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, and here so we may close them. - FOX 52 (talk) 04:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.rogerknapp.com/download/JapanMonumentforBoyScout.htm. The translation of the plaque is copyright, and the plaque itself is as well, unless the author has been dead for 50 years. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close them. Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
upper is a png and lower is a svg. But is this good enough? --Egel Reaction? 19:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 16:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've found this Facebook page about Manchukuo's Boy Scouts. I read they existed but I can't any pictures of them until now.
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1413380498965702.1073741837.1413112325659186&type=3
If I could find more about them, I may inform you about this.
--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome!
--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just by luck!
--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think so. Maybe I've read your page a long time ago, but I forgot it. Then I found out about the tidbit about Manchukuo and remembered your userpage.
--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure man. What do you need me to do?--Šolon (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close it. - FOX 52 (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a huge topic but long story short, basically couple of reasons:
Luckily, it is 21st century. We now have the Internet which gave us many volunteers a platform to regain our language. You will also see more native speakers in the next couple of generations since Manchu education was established at school by the Chinese government as they began to see Manchu language as a cultural heritage. However, it'll never be completely revived like it used to be, but it won't be completely dead just like Gaelic.--Šolon (talk) 23:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thanks for your invitation and discussion. We have established a community about the Taiwan's WikiProject Scouting and have a Facebook Fan Page and a Facebook group (both of these account name are @wikiscoutingtw). We are welcome to join us and feel free to discuss; you can use English to talk and we can understand. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 14:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) Hello. Thanks for the comments. Where is the error? All edited data had its source. I've also updated table settings to make them readable to readers. As far as flags and table settings are concerned - I was drawing on how the site about the Olympic Games is modified. (Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_Games_host_cities). Please accept my changes. They are correct and substantive. Thank you. --* User:Agi~cswiki
Hi, you can find some details of the four associations in these documents (I don't have personal recollections to add as this was 1970s and earlier):
Here is a reference to Winston that you could possibly use:
Zaian (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that you're working on a merge in Key (lock). I've managed to avoid working on merges so I start by thanking anyone willing to take on that task. However, merges typically include the copying of material from an existing article, and WP:COPYWITHIN has what I view as best practices for this activity, specifically noting that the edit summary should explain the article content was copied and have a link to the source page. At the moment, I get that readers could figure it out by seeing the template on the page but presumably that template will go away when you think the merger is completed and there will be no clear record of where the material came from and in particular, and of course the key point (notice how I cleverly invoked the word "key") is that attribution history is lost without the edit summary noting the source of the material.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just dropping by to say hi to fellow Wikipedia in Japan! Regards, Alex ShihTalk 04:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Rami R 09:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your actions and recognition of my efforts. Do you know which administrator I should request to have these pages disabled from IPs and new editors? Meaning who should I request for semi-protection of these pages from newcomers and IPs who keep making disruptive edits. Let me know if anyone is advisable to consult. Best regards.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 03:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this edit adding a "tone" tag to the article. Please could you make some suggestions on Talk:White_Mischief_(film) about how the article could be improved? --Northernhenge (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Were you able to take a look at the source? I'm still concerned that the paraphrasing may have broader problems. Samsara 09:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Could we continue on this request? --Goran tek-en (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good day. I notice you put a "tone" warning on the Battle of Liberty Place Monument article. Could you please be specific as to what problem(s) you think need to be addressed at Talk:Battle of Liberty Place Monument? Thanks! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to thank you for the nice note you left on my talk page. It's also nice to see you as active as ever and doing great work! Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 09:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User:Kintetsubuffalo,Thank you for your recent valuable contributions to the Wikipedia page Peace Treaty with North Korea.The meaning of contents is now clearer and transparent because of your efforts and corrections.Please refer to the AfD discussion link below and comment your feedback for the topic if possible.
Goodtiming8871 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have got vacances. I will about September 23th return.
Regards PawełMM (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I changed some of your sock tags related to the Zeitgeist articles. I thought you may be interested to see ShantaethePirates SPI as this is the sock that is vandalizing those articles. -- Dane talk 02:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close it. - FOX 52 (talk) 03:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Over the last several months I've noticed numerous edits changing the preposition "at", indicating location, to more generic prepositions, specifically "of", and possibly also "in", in reference to a specific location. While there may be instances where "at" is not an appropriate preposition, it's perfectly acceptable and appropriate to use when indicating something located at a particular place or its immediate vicinity. Other prepositions, such as "of" and "in" don't always provide the same meaning; for example, "of" in the same construction carries the implication that something originated in that place, not merely that it was there at a certain or indefinite point. In biographical articles, origin and location need to be carefully distinguished, and so "at" is usually preferable when the writer is not trying to indicate the subject's point of origin. "In" implies that the subject was located only within the physical boundaries of a place, which is often more specific than the information that the writer intends to convey, and may be inaccurate. For example, you can meet someone at a restaurant, or a tree, or a town, without meeting inside it. I realize that some people prefer to use "in" when speaking of something that occurs "at" a particular city or town, but that's often misleading. And some people prefer to use "of" whenever there's some relationship between a person and a place; but again, it's often misleading or inaccurate, when "at" merely indicates location, without implying origin or spatial relationship. I hope that moving forward, you'll consider whether the writer intended to give a location, or indicate belonging, origin, or relationship to the place's boundaries. "At" may be correct in many instances where a writer has chosen to use "of" or "in", but those prepositions frequently imply meanings other than those supplied by "at". P Aculeius (talk) 03:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Scout Association of the Bahamas 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Kintetsubuffalo. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, |
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Midori (violinist)#Japanese name. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Cuisine of Karachi is significantly different from the Sindhi cuisine and the merge would not be feasible. The cuisine of Karachi is closer to the Mughlai cuisine than to the Sindhi cuisine. The dishes, recipes and the ingredients are different in these cuisines. Centaur17 (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Kintetsubuffalo: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Kintetsubuffalo.
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. |
Kintetsubuffalo,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi, see [[4]] RoachPeter (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No arguments here. Spock has emotions, he simply suppresses them. Emotions are a valuable learning tool, hence Spock learns better than Data. Spock is also older than data, and could be portrayed by Nimoy throughout his life. They'd have to recast Data every 15 years to keep him going. Muah ha ha, people think I was joking when I mentioned having lists to prove these things...
The Je suis Ikea thing is actually a dig a Trump; around the time I made it (at the request of another editor) Trump had made a public remark about a recent terrorist attack in Sweden that never actually happened, except on some fake news site. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not often that I thank somebody for reverting my edits, but I thank you here as well as with the 'thank you' link - you are correct about the capitalizations. I put back the other minor edits (see the edit summary for the explanations).
Ira
Ira Leviton (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
scouting in Eastern Europe and Central Asia | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1558 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 12:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Have anything to add Scouting/USA? --evrik (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Ownby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Ownby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kintetsubuffalo/Archive 11,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evrik (talk • contribs) 12:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:24th World Scout Jamboree.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Schweizer Pfadfinderbund.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey friend, please give me a hand on watching the recent edits by user:Cold Season ([13][14]). This user favors Chinese culture and is deleting the content that is related "disgusting" Chinese culture, but specifically single out Manchu and Japanese ones. All the sources he is citing about Manchus actually came from one - Shirokogorov's, Social Organization of the Manchus: A Study of the Manchu Clan Organization which is based on Shirokogorov's visit to Northern Manchuria (not all Manchus) in 1900s and is obviously out of date, too.--Šolon (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Have added dates and refs for the article on Arthur W. V. Reeve. Hugo999 (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article Dilara Büyükbayraktar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. scope_creep (talk) 08:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kintetsubuffalo, IMDB is not a valid reference, it is non RS source and covered by WP:SPS. IMDB is user generated, and outwith editorial control. The only time it is valid, is if the information comes direct from the MPAA or the Writers Guild of America, and in both it is fact checked. A mini bio is not a valid source.scope_creep (talk)
DBigXray 14:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Senior Scout (Corpo Nazionale Giovani Esploratori ed Esploratrici Italiani).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've had very positive interactions with you and hope to have more. I'm sure you can recite the Scout Law, but a brief review may be in order.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Heartwork Symphony Of Destruction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:World Bureau (World Organization of the Scout Movement).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded or restored , File:License plate dimensions mockup.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes
and an |author=
to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).
If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded or restored , File:India license plate Maharashtra examples.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes
and an |author=
to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).
If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated if you could add or expand upon the {{information}} in these :
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please verify my interwiki. Xx236 (talk) 08:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kintetsubuffalo! Let me start off by saying that you didn't do anything wrong (yeah, I know... it's a cliche and typical opener for messages like this... lol) but I wanted to message you and advise caution when leaving messages like this one to other users (even blatant trolls) where you state that you're "less receptive to liars", call them out for their unbelievable stories, and then state that you're "monitoring everything [they] edit from now on". These kind of messages will either frustrate, anger, or chase away legitimate new users who (despite the odds) are actually trying to help but don't appear to be, or they'll signal disruptive users to increase the amount of vandalism and trolling they're causing in order to do as much damage as possible while their account isn't blocked because you've told them that you're onto them and that they're now being watched. Either way you look at it, it usually never results in a positive or desired response or outcome. If you look on the user's talk page, I usually stick to leaving warnings or assuming good faith when possible (even if I know for sure that the user's intent is to vandalize and troll). It keeps the potential for retaliation low, doesn't draw attention to myself, and you're not allowing yourself to "play any cards face up". Figured I'd just message you and share ;-). Thanks for being a committed editor to Wikipedia and keep up the excellent work :-)! Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have noticed several sourced paragraphs have been removed when looking at the Wikipedia Dirty War page as it appeared in early 2017. There appears to be an attempt to present a more sanitized version of events, blaming conservative and right wing Argentines while concealing the crimes of the crimes of the Left Wing Guerrilla Armies of the ERP and Montoneros. Your observations are most welcome. (Temruog (talk) 23:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Today Thursday 26 July, I included the following paragraph at the bottom of intro of the Dirty War Pg:
The Montoneros later admitted losing 5,000 guerrillas killed or disappeared,[1] and the People's Revolutionary Army (Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo or ERP) admitted the loss of another 5,000 of their own combatants killed or disappeared.[2]
It's important for the Argentine youth to not whitewash the crimes of the Left Wing Radicals that culminated in the 1976 Miltary Coup and the disappearances that followed among the guerrillas and their civilian supporters.
--Temruog (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kintetsubuffalo! I saw that you added the Sockpuppet template to User:Editeur17 and User:Editor0217. Based on the edits made by both users, I agree that these accounts are likely to be the same person. However, the Editor0217 account hasn't edited since August 20, and the Editeur17 account was created and began editing today. It's possible that this user may have forgotten the details of their old account (Editor0217) and made a new account in order to continue editing. You may want to simply message the new account and ask them about the other account and the similar edits. Just assume good faith from the get-go and see if they need help with editing. If you need help or if things start to turn disruptive, file an SPI report or let me know. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look, try to improve if needed. In any case, the idea is that the original Bulgarian Scout Association (ОБМР) had its own article, because it has nothing to do with the current OBS. Anyway, I have found very poor information and useful references in books.--Gilwellian (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Scout Promises by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Scout Promises by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Beland (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sent you a reply to your e-mail, hope you're having a wonderful day or night today. I had a good time at school today myself, it's a really sunny day here. Lolifan (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Replied to your e-mail. Having a good weekend myself, hope you are too. Lolifan (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anatoliy Chepiga en wp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Insider (talk) 06:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding 2600:1:C6E1:BDC1:A87F:C0E0:E4D:CAC (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I just opened the thread WP:ANI#Drinkreader IP edits: time for a community ban? —C.Fred (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't expecting to be thanked for blanking that section. It's nice to meet someone who appreciates the demise of unsourced trivia sections. Thanks for the thanks. Edaham (talk) 07:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I would like to split Economic inequality. According to this link the article is 202 kB and WP:SIZESPLIT suggests an article be split after 40 kB. Also, on the top of the page is a banner that is two years old suggesting the article should be split.
Since I am new, I would like to build a consensus first, rather than WP:BRD. To that end, I put a post on Talk:Economic_inequality and am contacting everyone who has edited the page in the past month.
Thanks for your time and please come down to discuss! Seahawk01 (talk) 01:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By the terms of your topic ban, you're required to inform users why you revert them, as you did here, by typing an explanation on their user talk page. Please remember to do so in the future. --Jayron32 12:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You put a tag on this article, for not being written in an encyclopedia format. My aim in writing this article was to be as straight forward as possible, and totally without any opinions and glamour-like words (as in magazines). Also to include all the illustrator's known credits, and back up every bit of detail. I've backed up even single lines with a reference, which is rarely done on nearly all articles. It could seem opinionated in the "background" section, but that is only setting the stage, and it's all backed up with a reference. A Wikipedia editor reviewed the article about a year ago and found everything quite sound, except felt a reference should be inserted in a spot. That led to my inserting reference #8. I'm through with this article, but probably the only one with knowledge to fix anything that needs fixing. It would help if you were more specific with that. I think it's one of the better articles on Wikipedia and received a B grade, long before I made major improvements to it (such as locating his portrait image). The extensive references/notes are needed, otherwise, much detail would not be possible to verify or locate. Jim Percy (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kintetsubuffalo: Some lines in the Background section may seem as opinionated, but they are really general knowledge and set the stage for the article. For instance: click onto the link in Reference #5, then click the words "Historical Note." Notice the sentence that goes " Because of this, the art of magazine illustrators and artists was perceived as a lesser body of work compared to the fine arts on display in museums and galleries through the early to mid twentieth century."
There is NO other sources on the Internet or elsewhere on this illustrator. Hence, all the information on him must be in this article. Nothing can be linked to somewhere else. Click onto Ref. #9. The LOC couldn't find any info on him! That's very typical of all illustrators of that era, excluding the top ten or so (like Rockwell, Parrish etc). Nonetheless, he passed the notoriety test years ago. In fact it was a Wikipedia editor (not myself) who decided he was also noteworthy as a tennis player. But, that has its merits, as his name was often in the New York City newspapers, and he did play in three US Opens. (I've seen articles on tennis players at Wikipedia, just because they played in one US Open.
UPDATE. I added Refs. 3 & 4 on 10/30/18. There are several internal links in that section though. I had to approach this article the direct opposite of a Rockwell. There is a ton of info on him in existence, hence, it no doubt had to be greatly condensed into an article. There is absolutely no info on this illustrator, hence, it had to be accumulated (otherwise be lost to history!) into an article. The overview in "Background" serves to explain why NO info exist on illustrators, outside of a handful. Jim Percy (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kintetsubuffalo: Okay. Awkwardly, when Ref. 3 was added, it changed the numbers of the previously mentioned references. And then when Re. 4 was added, it changed them all again. Hence keep correcting the reference nos., less they cause confusion if reread. Jim Percy (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Efforts for the East Valley of the Phoenix metropolitan area to secede from Maricopa County was in fact a real proposal in both the early 1990s and early 2000s. Since this was over 10 years ago and the issue hasn't resurfaced ever since, most resources on the effort are paywalled. However, this is not a hoax and this was in fact a serious proposal back then. ANDROS1337TALK 21:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]