24.104.132.98

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Thirteenth Pearl, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Thirteenth Pearl was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850665 on 2011-10-07T16:51:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

HEHEHEHEHEHE HI LILY!!!!!! <3 MALA

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mala was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-10-07T16:55:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tonicity, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tonicity was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925159 on 2011-10-27T12:25:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to North Carolina Tar Heels football appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rob Parker (sports journalist), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rob Parker (sports journalist) was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879229 on 2012-01-06T18:57:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pablo Escobar, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 13:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at BLT, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: BLT was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966523 on 2012-01-20T13:55:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wesleyan School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wesleyan School was changed by 24.104.132.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981539 on 2012-02-08T18:52:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talmud, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Koumz (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doughnut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Achowat (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doughnut, you may be blocked from editing. Achowat (talk) 18:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Circle with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Zad68 (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Calendar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 15:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Page with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Clock. Zad68 (talk) 15:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Amp71. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Otter because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Amp71 (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Larry Fitzgerald. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Mrt3366 ^{(Talk page?) (New section?)} 18:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Calvin Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. Brian the Editor (talk) 21:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Elie Wiesel, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Leemon2010. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Breaking Bad characters because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Leemon →^talk 13:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Sandberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. hmssolent\^{Let's convene} _{My patrols} 13:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peak (novel). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} ^(Whisper...) 13:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} ^(Whisper...) 13:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! — Bill william compton^Talk 13:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lost Battalion (World War I) , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Paula Deen— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Dobbs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Chlupsa, you may be blocked from editing. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Dobbs. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of ballets choreographed by Frederick Ashton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 15:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.