User:Bookku/sandbox19

  • Proposed article title: Imitation of non-Muslims by Muslims Redirects: Tashabbuh bi’l-kuffār, Tashabbuh تشبه
    • Note: It could be fine to use the Arabic term. For examples, see this article: Glossary of Islam
    • No apostrophe in "non-Muslims"
  • Short description Imitation of non-Muslim practices by Muslims (al-tashabbuh bi’l-kuffār التشبه بالكفار  ?).
  • Not to be confused with "tashabbuh bi-llāh"

Imitation of non-Muslims by Muslims (Arabic: التشبه بٱلكفار, romanizedal-Tashabbuh bi-'l-Kuffar) is a Sunni Islamic doctrine that considers imitation of others, mainly of non-Muslims, as deplorable.[1] Historically, the Islamic literary genre of tashabbuh treatises, which oppose imitation, have played a significant part in forming both Islamic orthodoxy and Muslim inter-religious relations.[1]

Definitions

  • According to Meir Hatina, tashabbuh is religious prohibition against imitating the infidel.[2] Youshaa Patel says, the verb tashabbaha can alternatively be translated as resembles, assimilates, or conforms.[3] p 366.
  • Edward William Lane defines the Arabic term, tašabbuh, as: “He became assimilated to him or it. He assumed, or affected, a likeness, or resemblance to him, or it. He imitated him or it. He made himself to be like, or resemble him or it.”[1]

According to Youshaa Patel it's the Hadith, not the Quran, supports the architecture of this doctrine.[3]

Q 5:51, in full, reads:[3]


A subsequent verse (Q 5:55) tells the believers who their true friends are: “Your

friend is only God, and His Messenger, and the believers….”[3]

Time line

According to Youshaa Patel, the pivotal hadith on imitation (1514 of Abu Dawood) progressed from a narrative statement to a normative dictum in three stages: (a) transmission among early Muslim authorities; (b) classification in canonical hadith collections; and (c) interpretation by the ʿulamā.ʾ[4] Patel says (p.363) that the custom likely to have first spread from late Umayyad Damascus, to Abbasid Baghdad, after the caliphate moved from the Umayyads to the Abbasids in the 8th century AD.[4]

  • Ibn ʿAbbās (Muḥammad’s cousin) (d. ca 68/687-688) [1] p.602


The doctrine and the sources

Tashabbuh is first mentioned in Hadith 1514 , book 16 of Abu Dawood Sulayman (b. Ash'ath al-Sijistani (d. 888-9).[5] This hadith states that “Whoever imitates a people becomes one of them” and this serves as one of the most frequently cited expressions on the 'Tashabbuh doctrine'.[4][6]

Youshaa Patel names this Hadith as 'imitation hadith'.[3] P362. According to Patel, the Prophet Muḥammad may not have said “Whoever imitates a people becomes one of them” as a standalone statement. Patel says, detailed analysis of its transmission history of the Hadith indicates that, even if prophet would have said, then, it's likely to have been part of a longer statement with a more specific context. Subsequent generations of Muslims separated this phrase out and in the course of time infusing new interpretations unto it, allowing distinct meaning to permeate independently.[3] p 363.

****


According to Muhammad Khalid Masud, while many traditional scholars relied on Abu Dawood's report/ hadiths, good number of scholars doubt these Hadiths for the reason, first, no mention is found in the earlier Hadith collectors, namely Bukhari (d. 870), Muslim (d. 875) and Malik (d. 795).[6] Secondly Abu Da’ud version differs in content with Hadith mentions of Ibn Hanbal’s (d. 855) Musnad, Abu’l Qasim al-Tabarani’s (d. 881) Mu’jam, and Abu ‘Isa Muhammad’s (b. 'Isa al-Tirmidhi (d. 892)) Jami’. Same time there can be some chance that Hanbal's Hadith is earlier one and Abu Da’ud's hadits is derived from Hanbal's following Hadith.[6]




I have been sent close to the Day of Judgment with the sword in order that God alone is worshipped without any associate. My sustenance is placed under the shade of my lance and humiliation and subjugation is ordained for those who oppose me. Whoever imitates a people belongs to them.[6]

~ Ibn Hanbal, Musnad (Riyadh: Dar al-Salam l’il nashr wa’l tawzi’, 2000), section Musnad Abd Allah b. Umar, Hadith no. 4869.[6]

Masud says Abu Da’ud and Tirmidhi, both, have been criticized on the technical ground that links among narrators seem weak.[7]

The following version in Tirmidhi Hadith, on one hand refers to different styles of greetings among other religious denominations, same time emphasizes the religiouscontext of the hadith.[7]

One who imitates others does not belong to us. Do not imitate the Jews and the Christians in the ways they greet; the Jews greet raising (ishara) fingers and the Christians by raising palm of the hand.

~ Tirmidhi, al-Jami’ (Riyadh: Dar al-Salam li’l nashr wa’l tawzi’, 2000), chapter Privacy and Manners, section Greetings, p. 1923.[7]

  • Apocalyptic version:
  • I was sent [by God] on the eve of the Hour [to fight] with the sword until God is worshipped alone without any other partner ascribed to him. My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and contempt have been placed upon the one who disobeys my command. And whoever imitates a people becomes one of them. [4] p.368


Discourse against imitation

According to Youshaa Patel seeds of Tashabbuh doctrine got planted during ninth and tenth century AD; Developed as a literary genre 14th -15th century, spread across globe 19th 20th century as impact of Salafism and in response to colonialism.

According to Youshaa Patel, while the meaning of the Hadith “Whoever imitates a people becomes one of them” would appear simple at the out set; describing objectively how imitation would influences  group belonging and social identity; and even more fundamentally, the saying also indicates that, the more time people stay together, the more they become similar. However, most Muslim religious scholarship (ʿulamāʾ), deviate from such neutral meaning, and apply the hadith to create traditions to establish clear divisions by defining who would belongs to the Muslim community, by interpreting the hadith as a strong warning for Muslims to keep themselves different from non-Muslims, especially Jews and Christians (ahl al-kitāb).[8] Patel says, In a single statement, the hadith differentiates between “us and them,” while bringing Muslims together same time making them distance from others; effectively puts pressure on Muslims to conform to the Muslim community and also forewarns about the risks of nonconformity like stigma, sin, and exclusion.[9]

Patel says, in present times , Muslim religious leadership in North America frequently refers to this doctrine to discourage Muslims against participating in celebrations like Christmas, Halloween,and Valentine’s Day, and from emulating non-Muslim ways of dressing and other cultural practices.[9]

Bruce Lawrence mentions an anecdotal tashabbuh incidence from 11th century Al-Biruni's book on the topic of 'The Exhaustive Treatment of Shadows' where in literalist muezzins were reluctant to use astrolabe in spite of accuracy it offered, since they were afraid to use any thing pertaining to Byzantine non-Muslims, then Al-Biruni retorted to them saying "The Byzantines also eat food and walk around in the market. Do not imitate them in these two things”.[10][11] [12]

  • According to Muhammad Haniff Hassan, Sunni Muslim scholarship[13](P 7.) holds that, means of civil disobedience are western import, not only proscribed by primary sources of Islam, amounts to innovative bid'ah,[13][14] but also the concept of civil disobedience in it's all forms is al-tashabbuh bil-kuffar immitating ways of non-Muslim in this case imitation of West. Hassan notes, Shaykh Al Albany regards such imitation of others through acts of civil disobedience Muslims would end up utilizing illicit means to correct the ruler and society and Shaykh Al-Muhsin Al-Abbad Al-badr is also of similar opinion.[13]
  • According to Mohamed Bin Ali, for modern Salafis social dimension of WB give and take of gifts from non-Muslims, joining them in their religious festivals, listening to music especially non-Islamic one, using non-hijri calendar as tashabbuh.[15] Former Mufti of Saudi Arabia, too, had said that participating in celebrations and feast of non-Muslims is not allowed.[15]
  • Bustamam-Ahmad, Kamaruzzaman. Islamic thought in Southeast Asia: New Interpretations and Movements. United Kingdom, University of Malaya Press, 2013. P 10, 11.

literature

Roel Meijer’, G. E. Von Grunebaum




Fatwa literature

Tashabbuh and orthodoxy

From the view point of the traditional Islamic scholars and clergy, keeping tab on tašabbuh (imitation) and bidʿa (innovation) is essential, if unchecked, can disrupt Islamic orthodoxy. Imitation (tašabbuh) and innovation (bidʿa), overlaps and complements each other in maintaining and enhancing the authority of the Prophet Muḥammad’s sunnah.[16]

According to Richard Gauvain in Salafi Ritual Law and Practice, Al-Wala' wal-Bara' is main principle, ritualized according to al-tashabbuh hadith, by which (Salafi) Muslims tend to distance themselves from all non-Muslim beliefs and practices. [17] Gauvain says at times Salafi scholar like Al-Albani's extended this principle even to hold prayers in a mosque with one's shoes. as permissible, because as per Al-Albani's analogy the Jews do not pray in their shoes;[17] while usually, praying with shoes on, is not the case and runs counter to the wider Islamic consensus, and more specifically to Hanbali jurisprudence.[18] According to Joas Wagemakers purpose of Al-Wala' wal-Bara' concept, in early Islam, may have been about not allowing taking of help from non-Muslim by making Muslims to choose one of the two political entity in times of war, eventually that purpose may have been conflated to not allowing imitation of non-Muslim (tashabbuh al-kuffar or al-mushabaha -li-l-kuffar), that may bee the reason development of such understanding among most Salafi scholars.[19]


Tashabbuh and Muslim inter-religious relations

Pact of Umar

While Pact of Umar deals with restrictions on Christian subjects not to imitate Muslims, the hadith based tashabbuh literature attempts to restrict Muslims from imitating non-muslims.[24]

Transvaal fatwa

Transvaal fatwa was issued by Muhammad Abduh (1849 – 11 July 1905), an Egyptian modernist Islamic scholar, and then Grand Mufti of Egypt.[25][26][27][28][26] **on 25th December 1903.[29]

(**Copy pasted from Muhammad Abduh). In December 1903 Abduh had received a petition from a Muslim from Transvaal, South Africa seeking fatwa to understand a) whether it would be permissible to use European style hats? b) Whether it's okay for Muslims to eat meat slaughtered by Transvaal Christians c) Was it okay for a Muslim of Shafi Madhhab to perform communal prayers led by a Hanafi imam?[29] Abduh's fatwa hold that if believer is not intending apostasy then wearing a hat would not amount tashabbuh; about denying validity of prayer with imam of other Islamic sect, Abduh hold that would amount to undermining unity of Islam; Abduh's fatwa also deduced to permit eating meat of the animals slaughtered by Jews and Christians, they being people of the book.[29] This fatwa steered an immediate backlash and a long discourse on the topic in Muslim world.[29]

Copt - Muslim relations

According to Catherine Mayeur-Jaouen, since the twentieth-century, fundamentalist revivalism among both Copts and Muslims, along with urbanization and also the inhospitable disparagement, by Salafiyya high priests of imitation of Christians in western forms, as well as folk custom of cult of saints and worshiping them together, has caused reduction in sharing of interfaith saints, shrines and ritual culture among Copts and Muslims.[30]

Mutual criticism

Moderation and liberalism

Cosmopolitanism and tashabbuh

According to Muhammad Khalid Masud, in both Muslim and non-Muslim societies, the twenty-first-century discourse pertaining globalism, pluralism, integration, multiculturalism, Islamophobia and inter-faith dialogues has opened up further concerns regarding cosmopolitanism and tashabbuh.[31] Masud says that,G. E. Von Grunebaum discusses the doctrine of tashabbuh bi’l-kuffar, which forbids imitating non-Muslims.[32] Grunebaum argues that, this doctrine inculcates a sense of religious superiority that blocks interaction with other non-Muslims. By prioritising similarities and differences, the tashabbuh doctrine sets unequivocal marker of cultural authenticity within the theological context of religious identity, effectively discouraging cosmopolitanism among Muslim societies, is a common belief.[32] Masud says that this common belief that the pursuit of cultural authenticity and religious identity in the contemporary Muslim world dissuades cosmopolitanism is problematic. This belief complicates the concept of cosmopolitanism by binding it with the issue of cultural authenticity.[32] Derryl N. MacLean  says, after recontextualizing South Asian Islamic religious opinions on tashabbuh bi’l-kuffar, Masud argues that British imperialism and subsequent communalism and nationalism perturbed Indo-Muslim cosmopolitanism, Masud further says, in the process distinct political and cultural differences between religion and culture were emerging, also along with new forms of openness were being imagined; MacLean says, in spite of taking note of accommodation through change in context as discussed in Masu's study, interpretations of tashabbuh seem to remain constrained by its place in the broader fiqh.[33]

See also

List is temporarily long to invite more diverse active user participation/ contribution from various related articles.

Bibliography

  • Al-Tashabbuh - Youshaa Patel Patel, Youshaa. The Muslim Difference: Defining the Line Between Believers and Unbelievers from Early Islam to the Present. United States, Yale University Press. p.50
  • Patel, Youshaa. “Whoever Imitates a People Becomes One of Them”. Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 25, No. 4 (2018), pp. 359-426 (68 pages). Published By: Brill https://www.jstor.org/stable/26571305
  • Patel, Youshaa. "The Islamic Treatises against Imitation (Tašabbuh): A Bibliographical History". Arabica 65.5-6 (2018): 597-639. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-12341517 Web.
  • Ali Altaf Mian, The Muslim Difference: Defining the Line between Believers and Unbelievers from Early Islam to the Present By Youshaa Patel, Journal of Islamic Studies, Volume 35, Issue 1, January 2024, Pages 106–111, https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etad042 academic.OUP.
  • Tareen, SherAli. Perilous Intimacies: Debating Hindu-Muslim Friendship After Empire. United States, Columbia University Press, 2023.
  • Buddhist and Islamic Orders in Southern Asia: Comparative Perspectives. United States, Knowledge Unlatched, 2019.p.47
  • Bosanquet, Antonia. Minding Their Place: Space and Religious Hierarchy in Ibn Al-Qayyim’s Aḥkām Ahl Al-dhimma. Netherlands, Brill, 2020. p.309
  • Ingram, Brannon D.. Revival from Below: The Deoband Movement and Global Islam. United States, University of California Press, 2018. p.103-4
  • Chittick, William C.. The Heart of Islamic Philosophy: The Quest for Self-knowledge in the Teachings of Afḍal Al-Dīn Kāshānī. Kiribati, Oxford University Press, 2001. p.73
  • Law, Religion and Love: Seeking Ecumenical Justice for the Other. N.p., Taylor & Francis, 2017.
  • Ahn, Daniel S. H., et al. Religious Encounters in Transcultural Society: Collision, Alteration, and Transmission. United States, Lexington Books, 2017.p13
  • Ruffle, Karen G.. Everyday Shi'ism in South Asia. United Kingdom, Wiley, 2021. p.154
  • Weiss, Max David. Institutionalizing Sectarianism: Law, Religious Culture, and the Remaking of Shi'i Lebanon, 1920-1947. United States, Stanford University, 2007. p155-161
  • Moj, Muhammad. The Deoband Madrassah Movement: Countercultural Trends and Tendencies. United Kingdom, Anthem Press, 2015.p153
  • Weiss, Max. In the Shadow of Sectarianism. United Kingdom, Harvard University Press, 2010. p.81, 84
  • Pazos, Antón M.. Pilgrims and Pilgrimages as Peacemakers in Christianity, Judaism and Islam. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2016. p. 80
  • Gesink, Indira Falk. Islamic Reform and Conservatism: Al-Azhar and the Evolution of Modern Sunni Islam. United Kingdom, I.B.Tauris, 2009. p.180
  • Gesink, Indira Falk. Islamic Reform and Conservatism: Al-Azhar and the Evolution of Modern Sunni Islam. United Kingdom, I.B.Tauris, 2009. p.188
  • Masud, Muhammad Khalid. "Chapter 9 Cosmopolitanism and Authenticity: The Doctrine of Tashabbuh Bi’l-Kuffar (“Imitating the Infidel”) in Modern South Asian Fatwas". Cosmopolitanisms in Muslim Contexts: Perspectives from the Past, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012, pp. 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748644575-010 [31]
  • Cultural Pearls from the East: In Memory of Shmuel Moreh (1932-2017). Netherlands, Brill, 2021.p.296
  • Kresse, Kai. Swahili Muslim Publics and Postcolonial Experience. United States, Indiana University Press, 2018.
  • Imagining the Public in Modern South Asia. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2018. Chapter 4
  • Abd-Allah, Umar Faruq. “ISLAM AND THE CULTURAL IMPERATIVE.” CrossCurrents, vol. 56, no. 3, 2006, pp. 357–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24461405.
  • Etty Terem (2023)Muslim men, European hats: a fatwā on cultural appropriation in a global age, The Journal of North African Studies, 28:3, 563-588, DOI:10.1080/13629387.2021.1973246 Taylor and Fransis online.
  • M Kurz. ISBN online: 978-3-95650-454-9. Protectors, Statesmen, Terrorists? Gender and Masculinities in Muslim Texts and Contexts. God's Own Gender? Masculinities in World Religions. Germany, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2018.
  • Ingram, Brannon D.. Crises of the public in Muslim India, critiquing 'custom' at Aligarh and Deoband Imagining the Public in Modern South Asia. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2018.
  • Shavit, Uriya (2013). Can Muslims Befriend Non-Muslims? Debating al-walāʾ wa-al-barāʾ (Loyalty and Disavowal) in Theory and Practice. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 25(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2013.851329
  • Lawrence, Bruce. Muslim Cosmopolitanism, The Idea of Islam. United Kingdom, C Hurst & Company, 2012. p 22. - Al Biruni (Also refer: Lawrence, Bruce B.. The Bruce B. Lawrence Reader: Islam Beyond Borders. United States, Duke University Press, 2020.; https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/wps/ccas/0021788/f_0021788_18030.pdf)
  • Rassi, Salam. Christian Thought in the Medieval Islamicate World: Abdisho of Nisibis and the Apologetic Tradition. United Kingdom, OUP Oxford, 2022. P 201.

Further reading

  • Juynboll, G. H. A. “Dyeing the Hair and Beard in Early Islam A Ḥadīth-Analytical Study.” Arabica, vol. 33, no. 1, 1986, pp. 49–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4057156.
  • Rock-Singer, Aaron. In the Shade of the Sunna: Salafi Piety in the Twentieth-Century Middle East. United States, University of California Press, 2022. Chapter 6 (Search term imitation)
  • Moj, Muhammad. The Deoband Madrassah Movement: Countercultural Trends and Tendencies. United Kingdom, Anthem Press, 2015.
  • Skovgaard-Petersen, Jacob. Defining Islam for the Egyptian State: Muftis and Fatwas of the Dār Al-Iftā. Netherlands, Brill, 2021.
  • Identity formation in Muslim world
  • de Koning, Martijn. ""You Follow the Path of the Shaitan; We Try to Follow the Righteous Path": Negotiating Evil in the Identity Construction of Young Moroccan-Dutch Muslims". Coping with Evil in Religion and Culture. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401205375_010 Web.
  • Gutmann, Timothy. "Distinguishing Companions: Mixed-Confession Education, Assimilation, and Islamic Thought". Sociology of Islam 7.4 (2019): 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00704003 Web.
  • Hadas Hirsch (2021) The Prophet Muḥammad’s Ring:Raw Materials, Status, and Gender in Early Islam, Journal of Arabian Studies, 11:2, 314-328, DOI: 10.1080/21534764.2021.2007569
  • Tieszen, Charles. "Chapter 20 Discussing religious practices". Christian-Muslim Relations A Bibliographical History. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004423701_021 Web.
  • Pegram, N.D., Austin, D.A., Muqowim, Duderija, A., Luetz, J.M. (2023). Character Formation in Muslim and Christian Higher Education: A Comparative Case Study Between Australia and Indonesia (Part Two). In: Luetz, J.M., Austin, D.A., Duderija, A. (eds) Interfaith Engagement Beyond the Divide. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3862-9_12
  • Shadid, W. A. R., and Koningsveld, P. Sj. van. Political Participation and Identities of Muslims in Non-Muslim States. Netherlands, Kok Pharos, 1996.
  • Tamcke, Martin. Koexistenz und Konfrontation: Beiträge zur jüngeren Geschichte und Gegenwartslage der orientalischen Christen. Germany, Lit, 2003.
  • MacLean, Derryl N., and Sikeena Karmali Ahmed, editors. Cosmopolitanisms in Muslim Contexts: Perspectives from the Past. Edinburgh University Press, 2012. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt3fgs9b.
  • Von Grunebaum, G. E.. Modern Islam: The Search for Cultural Identity. United States, University of California Press, 2023. p240
  • Von Grunebaum, G. E. “Nationalism and Cultural Trends in the Arab Near East.” Studia Islamica, no. 14, 1961, pp. 121–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1595188.
  • Arin Shawkat Salamah-Qudsi: "The idea of tashabbuh in sufi communities and literature of the late 6th/12th and early 7th/13th century in Baghdad" in Al-Qantara: Revista de Estudios Arabes 32/1 (2011) 175–197. Hier S. 181–189 (Sufi outlook)
  • The Idea of Islam. United Kingdom, C Hurst & Company, 2012.
  • Editors: Oliver Leaman, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, History of Islamic Philosophy. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2013.
  • Qadri, A. D., & Zubair, M. . (2021). Hadith Tashabbuh: A Critical Evaluation in the light of ‘Ilm Asmā-al-Rijāl: حدیث تشبہ:علم اسماء الرجال کی روشنی میں سندی وتحقیقی جائزہ. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities" (Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan), 1(1), 23–31. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/16
  • Ali, Muhamad. "Chapter 18: Khutbahs and fatwas in colonial Indonesia and Malaya". Research Handbook on Islamic Law and Society. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018. < https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003060.00030>.
  • Zebiri, Kate. (1995). Relations between Muslims and non‐Muslims in the thought of Western‐educated Muslim intellectuals. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 6(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419508721055
  • Harmakaputra, H.A. (2020), Say “No” to Christmas? An Analysis of the Islamic Fatwa on the Prohibition against Wearing Non-Muslim Symbols in Indonesia. Muslim World, 110: 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12352
  • Lacroix, Stéphane. Awakening Islam: The Politics of Religious Dissent in Contemporary Saudi Arabia. United Kingdom, Harvard University Press, 2011. p 108
  • Mayeur-Jaouen, Catherine. What do Egypt's Copts and Muslims share? the issue of shrines, Sharing Sacred Spaces in the Mediterranean: Christians, Muslims, and Jews at Shrines and Sanctuaries. United States, Indiana University Press, 2012. Page 166
  • American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 32:2. N.p., International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2015. Page 101.
  • Saparudin, Saparudin (2017-06-30). "Salafism, State Recognition and Local Tension: New Trends in Islamic Education in Lombok". Ulumuna. 21 (1): 81–107. doi:10.20414/ujis.v21i1.1188. ISSN 2355-7648.
  • Hassan, Muhammad Haniff. Civil Disobedience in Islam: A Contemporary Debate. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 2017. P 35. (Author: Muhammad Haniff Hassan is a Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests Islamism, wasatiyah, and contemporary Islamic jurisprudence.)
  • Ali, Mohamed Bin. Roots Of Religious Extremism, The: Understanding The Salafi Doctrine Of Al-wala' Wal Bara'. Singapore, Publisher Imperial College Press, Distributor: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2015. P 10. (Author: Research Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.)
  • Şule Yüksel UYSAL .The Revaluation of the Hadith “Man Tashabbaha Bi Qawmin Fa Huwa Minhum” in Terms of Global Dress Culture. Journal of Turkish Studies (2016)
  • Levy-Rubin, Milka. Non-Muslims in the Early Islamic Empire: From Surrender to Coexistence. United States, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • Hatina, Meir. Fatwas as a prism of social history in the middle east, The status of non-Muslims in the nineteenth century. Tamcke, Martin. Koexistenz und Konfrontation: Beiträge zur jüngeren Geschichte und Gegenwartslage der orientalischen Christen. Germany, Lit, 2003. P 58.

References

Categories to be added

Category:Islamic culture, Category:Sunni belief and doctrine Category:Islamic philosophy Category:Islamic terminology Category:TabooCategory:Cultural anthropologyReligious discrimination Category:Moral psychologyCategory:Social philosophy