This template is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Removed "winged helmets" as part of the equipment since they do not differ from regular helmets in any way but the paint. Violates neutrality by promoting one (major) teams helmet over others. 75.185.5.127 (talk)
Nose guard or Nose tackle
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just merged Nose tackle into Nose guard while cleaning up the merge backlog. This template links to Nose Tackle, which is now a redirect to Nose guard. Not sure if it would be best to change the template or the name of the Nose Guard article. AIRcorn(talk)07:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Plans for American Football Articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
It's probably better to discuss your changes first. You can work on the template in your userspace, then present it for discussion as a finished work. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just curious how many different articles are there on formation types, because that could be a separate section unto itself. DandyDan2007 (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Getting lengthy
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@MisterCake: I think this is one of the largest navboxes I've ever seen. Maybe we should make penalties into a separate navbox, since that section seems to be eating up the most real estate. Then it can be subdivided into 5-, 10-, and 15- yard penalties. Or personal/team fouls etc. Lizard (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)