Talk:Wilhelm Windelband

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Bellacoolaman in topic Why Japanese reception?
WikiProject iconGermany Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Logic / Science / Modern Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Logic
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of science
Taskforce icon
Modern philosophy

Regarding the Bibliography

I added the list of works available in English, but there are others in German that I didn't add because I can't tell what title is what (for example, which ones match the English translations). Someone who is better with German might want to give it a try. I found the English titles from various websites, and verified them with the Library of Congress website. There were a number of titles in other languages listed there. (And I'm just getting used to editing, too.) -- RL0919 Talk

Why Japanese reception?

I reluctantly did not edit/remove the section on Japanese reception of Windelband because someone must have thought this was important. But it seems a very specialized subsection for so short and stubby an article and it would be useful if someone would include in the main body of the description why this is at all significant in a general encyclopaedia entry on the philosopher. Bellacoolaman (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)