Talk:Tom Jefferson (epidemiologist)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 74.69.172.76 in topic Role in Cochrane mask review
WikiProject iconMedicine: Society Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).


Date of birth is needed--2A00:1FA0:4A1A:5926:0:4D:50DE:2501 (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Role in Cochrane mask review

His role in the 2023 update to the Cochrane review on mask efficacy merits inclusion. Reagle (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, he's now been denounced by the Cochrane editors for lying about the contents of the study.
https://www.cochrane.org/news/statement-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses-review?fbclid=IwAR1oFyFzxRGfmk4gh3VpsEUCp7wJuhZmbccHlGvDCM86lzLq28YxnxSwA6k
He's a scientific fraud. I know Wikipedia is very cautious about saying this in biographies of living people, but now that the Cochrane editor is saying it... 74.69.172.76 (talk) 02:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
The Cochrane editors don't say specifically who they're condemning for misreporting the conclusions of the study, but it's Tom Jefferson they're condemning. His quotes misreporting the study, which they had to respond to are here.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2023/2/22/23609499/masks-covid-coronavirus-cochrane-review-pandemic-science-studies-infection
I'm not sure the best way to put this in Wikipedia, but the only thing which makes Tom Jefferson notable is his role in this fraud. 74.69.172.76 (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)