This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
The article states that the Power of Four is used for different sporting events where the UK and RoI have a joint team. I can't think of any other than the Lions (now that the Great Britain national rugby league team have dropped the '& Ireland' and I think golf (Walker Cup?). To my knowledge nobody has ever thought of using the Power of Four except the Lions.GordyB13:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Whilst Wrestlinglover does a full review on this, just wanted to mention that the article seems to cover the usage and reaction to the song well, but there isn't much about the actual composition itself (things like the key & time it's written in, verse structure, what instruments it's written for etc.) That might need addressing for it to reach GA standard. Cymru82 (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of other areas in the infobox not completed. Is there no other information to place in this?
"every Lions game." - Remove Lions, kind of redundant and common sense since you already said who it was for.
"didn't engage with it and it was also noted that the fans didn't like it" - WP:CONTRACTIONS
Background
"an anthem played to" - Remove played. That way it is "did not have an anthem to represent them"
2005 Lions Tour
"that they would have learnt the words by the time they had arrived in New Zealand." - Awkward sentence in my view. I would switch it up to "that they would know the words by the time they arrived in New Zealand."
Reception
"Lions captain, Martin Corry" - Remove comma, disrupts the flow.
Overall the article is fine. Not alot of info is featured but it existed for such a short time this is expected. Fix the above comments and I'll look at it again. It is close to GA.--WillC19:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed most of them. The only one I'm having a problem is the ENGVARB one, I am struggling to find the rogue American English term that must have slipped in, either that or the template was placed in error. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk)19:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]