Talk:The Alamo: 13 Days to Glory

Latest comment: 10 years ago by BDD in topic Requested move
WikiProject iconMilitary history: War films Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
War films task force
WikiProject iconTelevision: American Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American television task force.
WikiProject iconWesterns: Film Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Film task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

The Alamo: Thirteen Days to GloryThe Alamo: 13 Days to Glory – Many sources use either "13" or "thirteen". But I'm proposing 13 because of conciseness. George Ho (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Support move, as this is indeed more concise and is also the way it appears in the poster in the article. - WPGA2345 - 04:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.