Talk:Space Race (Archer)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Gen. Quon in topic GA Review
Good articleSpace Race (Archer) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconTelevision: Episode coverage Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Space Race (Archer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 23:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

I will review this soon.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Image: Add a FUR rationale to a picture and not just a generic boilerplate one
    •  Done
  • Infobox: I like bullets with my guest stars, but not a biggie
    •  Done Most episode article have bullets in it.
  • Lede: Link third season
  •  Done
  • Lede: "alongside with actor Dave Willis" -> "alongside actor Dave Willis"
  • Lede: "The successive episode, although acclaimed by television commentators, produced more fluctuation amongst the critiques, which were more critical of its humor and general execution." What does this mean? First you say it was acclaimed by the critics, but then you say it produced fluctuation amongst the "critiques" (Do you mean 'critics'?). I thought they had already acclaimed it?
    • It was acclaimed because of the high ratings given from the critics, but some aspects of "Part II" were criticized as opposed to "Part I". I did reword it, however.
  • Plot: "which is set into two modes;" I think that semicolon should be a colon, since its basically functioning as an equals sign
    •  Done
  • Ratings: Maybe explain what a "0.7 rating" is for the layman
    •  Done
  • Reception: I rearranged the last paragraph a bit. But who said the ""Sorry, hilarious as both. As early as the stunning end of the world sequence..." quote?
    •  Done
  • References: Link The A.V. Club and The Onion
    •  Done

That's all. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Should be good to go now. :) —DAP388 (talk) 02:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks good! I'll pass it.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)