Talk:Samkhya

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 88.218.17.150 in topic Incorrect characterization of Prakriti
WikiProject iconIndia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject iconNepal High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion: New religious movements Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject iconSpirituality Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Metaphysics / Epistemology / Eastern / Ancient High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Epistemology
Taskforce icon
Eastern philosophy
Taskforce icon
Ancient philosophy

c.q.

What does this abbreviation c.q. mean? It appears not to be an English abbreviation. Jayarava (talk) 10:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Casu quo ("in which case, if that be the case"). Is it a Dutch Latinism? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Samkhya Darsana

Voice 2401:4900:4BC8:594B:1:0:65E9:2875 (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction: Richard Garbe

Richard Karl von Garbe was incorrectly described on this page as a "Christian missionary" (no sources included to establish this). To the best of my knowledge, sources show he was a professor of philosophy in Germany, with a deep interest and substantial research on Indian philosophy. Sources are listed here (they are not directly relevant to the article so I didn't include them there). I urge editors to be a little more careful in checking their sources and information. - Naushervan (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


- Bagchi, Kaushik. "An Orientalist in the Orient: Richard Garbe's Indian journey, 1885-1886." Journal of World History, vol. 14, no. 3, Sept. 2003, pp. 281+. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A106646926/AONE. Accessed 6 Dec. 2022.

- Zimmermann, R. “RICHARD KARL von GARBE, 22nd Sept. 1927.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, vol. 9, no. 2/4, 1928, pp. 339–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44028003. Accessed 6 Dec. 2022. Naushervan (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect characterization of Prakriti

The article mentions that Prakriti is inactive, unconscious, and is a balance of the three guṇas (qualities or innate tendencies), namely sattva, rajas, and tamas. Prakriti is anything but unconscious. It is not dead matter, and for the record even dead matter is conscious. This whole universe of animate and inanimate objects is very much conscious, including rocks and stones. Also, just because Prakriti has been distinguished from Purusha which is consciousness, it does not mean that Prakriti is unconscious and inactive. The awareness or consciousness inherent in living bodies is of lesser vibration than that associated with the mind, and still lesser than pure awareness. 203.163.245.184 (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Saṃsāra 88.218.17.150 (talk) 07:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Saṃsāra 88.218.17.150 (talk) 07:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Saṃsāra 88.218.17.150 (talk) 07:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)