Talk:SMS Drache (1861)

SMS Drache (1861) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Drache (1861) is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 8, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
December 22, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Drache/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Section 1; para 1; There are many consistency errors in the the para and the infobox. Here goes the list:

Parameter	Prose	Infobox
Length	70.1 meters (230 ft 0 in)	62.78 m (206 ft 0 in)
Beam	14 meters (45 ft 11 in)	13.94 m (45 ft 9 in)
Draft	6.8 meters (22 ft 4 in)	6.3 m (20 ft 8 in)
Displacement	2,824 long tons/3,110 long tons	2,707 long tons
Indicated HP	1,540 kW	1,374 kW
Speed	10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph)	11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph)

Please correct these. And also mostly in many of other ship articles of Austia-Hungary (mostly done by you), used the displcament format as XXX tons (XXX long tons; XXX short tons). Please consider the same here.

Should all be fixed now.

Section 1; para 2; "they carried a pair of landing guns, one of which was an 8-pounder and the second was a 4-pounder", nothing about this guns was put in the infobox.
- Added
Section 2; A comma (,) after "to protect Austria's coastline"
- Added
Section 2.2; para 1; Remove thedup-link of Venice. First linked in para 1 of Section 2.1
- Fixed
Consider adding the information about guns refitted around 1867 to the infobox.
- Done

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, should all be done now. Parsecboy (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Add topic