.svg){kind=small} | Buddhism Low‑importance | ||||||
| |||||||
When was building construction started and completed? Also is the current structure as shown in the picture two millennia old? I thnk this information should be clearly stated in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.195.47 (talk) 17:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes!!! The structure is two millennia old. As per my knowledge they did some minor fixes and painted it recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.234.99 (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
POV v. Encyclopaedic Language
As written, this article contains a great deal of POV language, from essentially quoting directly the source in the construction section to the strongly laudatory lines about the object itself. I will remove what i can and consider necessary; obviously what i take out is still available in the history, should i be too radical. We must be careful, however, not to have WP speak praise rather than record facts. Happy days, LindsayHello 17:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is still hella whack. "numerous types of beings attended the enshrinement of the relics" wtf? zeleftikam (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Who built?
Who built it? See Anuradhapura_Kingdom#History --AntanO 03:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Who built what? Ask the question clearly--L Manju (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- The question about Ruwanwelisaya. So, you can literally understand the question. --AntanO 05:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Title change
The title of this, Ruwanwelisaya seems to be a broken spelling; its recommended to call it Ruwanweliseya, since seya is used more often as a standard word than saya. So the title must either be Ruwanwelisæya or Ruwanweliseya. Kommune12 (talk) 23:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)