This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
"It's because they couldn't use Rudolph's name at all, not even to mention that Robbie was his son."
But why? Hopefully Rudolph isn't still under some kind of copyright. Was it a fictional plot element that prevented Rudolph's name from being spoken? The article lacks sufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. CanadianCaesar23:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
I agree, I was wondering the same thing. Someone who knows more about this subject needs to clear this up and add to the article.
It's quite likely that Rudolph is still copyright, having been created after 1923. The stifling of Rudolph's name is implied as a joke that it wasn't possible to get copyright permission, but not explicitly stated (as this would break the fourth wall.AlmostReadytoFly19:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Shortening
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion