Talk:Rhode Island Route 403

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
Good articleRhode Island Route 403 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 10, 2009Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconUnited States: Rhode Island Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhode Island Route 403/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. What makes Davisville so historic?
    1. I removed all of the "historic" references; Davisville was referred to as such by the RIDOT sources I used, but I'm not really sure what makes it historic, seeing as it isn't a U.S. Historic District like many other Rhode Island communities.
  2. "route 4": "route" should be capitalized.
    1. Fixed
  3. In the Original Route 403 section, you transpose the termini, the route ran from RI 4 east to US 1.
    1. Fixed
  4. In the Quonset Freeway section, the route heads to the southeast, not the southwest.
    1. Fixed
  5. Do not use "then" in describing progression of route in route description.
    1. Removed occurrences
  6. Delink dates.
    1. Done
  7. Shields should not be in the colspan notes denoting the beginning and end of the route (you have a RI 401 shield instead of a RI 403 shield anyway).
    1. Removed

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Cheers, Raime 03:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)