Talk:Raymond Riles

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Texas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Raymond Riles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Add a serial comma between "attempted rape, burglary and robbery".
  • Add a serial comma between "moon, barked and tried to bite".
  • Add a comma after "at various points".
  • "for attempted murder of a police officer" → "for the attempted murder of a police officer"
  • Add a serial comma between "piles of papers, Bibles and other books".
  • "for Henry's murder and for Riles's" → "for Henry's murder and Riles's"
  • Archive sources (you can use this automatic tool).
  • Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk)
Some Dude From North Carolina, thanks for the feedback. I think I have addressed the points above. I got out of the habit of archiving links a long time ago, finding it tedious and not realizing that there was an automated approach. Thanks for letting me know about that - very easy! Should the accessdates remain for archived links? Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)