Talk:Price gouging

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Tojasonharris in topic no such thing - this is a political term
WikiProject iconEconomics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 23 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kguth.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

no such thing - this is a political term

price gouging is clearly a political term invented to demonize the basic functions of a free market. when supply falls, price has to increase to prevent shortages. econ 101. those who do not believe in econ 101 invent various terms to undermine basic functions of a free economy because "muh feels". notice that the definition says price gouging is when a price goes higher to what is "reasonable" or "fair". what on earth is that? who decides what is reasonable and fair? Corn9090 (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Price gouging is crime/civil wrong in many jurisdictions. As such, it is a legal concept and is rightly included in Wikipedia. It may be political in the sense that various governments may have policies related to this. But ultimately, the concept is the subject of multiple pieces of legislation and is therefore a legitimate concept regardless of how any given person may feel about particular policies or laws related to it. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Worldwide view flag

Hi all! I made additions to the article to include related regulation in the UK and EU in order to demonstrate the range in anti-competition efforts. I would appreciate feedback on whether more edits should be made or if it is appropriate to remove the "worldwide view" flag. Thank you! Jessg724 (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

I actually added a new section before I noticed yours. My original comment was: "This article is too focused on one country and needs to be expanded to include a broader focus and de-localised. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)." I think the page is still very much in need of this flag. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)