Talk:Pan-American Highway

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

South America: Argentina / Chile / Colombia / Ecuador / Peru / Venezuela Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chile (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Colombia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ecuador (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peru (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Low-importance).

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Roads: Alberta / British Columbia / Manitoba / Saskatchewan / Yukon Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Alberta
	British Columbia
	Manitoba
	Saskatchewan
	Yukon

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, add |needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

U.S. Roads: Interstates / California / Oregon / Washington / Nevada / Arizona / Utah / Idaho / Montana / New Mexico / Colorado / Wyoming / Texas / Oklahoma / Kansas / Missouri / Iowa / Minnesota Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	California Oregon Washington Nevada Arizona Utah Idaho Montana New Mexico Colorado Wyoming Texas Oklahoma Kansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article does not require a KML file.

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 3 months ago7 comments6 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. TRL (talk) 03:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Should Pan-American Highway (North America) and Pan-American Highway (South America) both be merged to this article? Reasons would include avoiding needless duplication of content, or possible conflicts in content, when different pages have been edited or updated at different times by different editors. This would instead create a single, comprehensive article.

This would also have the benefit of a single talk page, instead of having discussions spread across two or three different pages, or having different editors discussing the same content on different pages, (either at the same to different times), leading to competing outcomes for the same content issues. Thoughts? - wolf 09:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey @TheWolfChild, this makes sense - we are talking about the exact same road but just in different continents so go ahead with it in my opinion. The International E-road network in Europe does not have a different page for every-single country, so don't know how this situation differs. Roads4117 (talk) 19:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

It's separate roads though. They do not connect because of the Darien Gap. For that reason, I wouldn't merge them. Imzadi 1979 → 03:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979: The Trans-Canada Highway is found on both Vancouver Island and Newfoundland, each separated by bodies of water. Anyone wishing to travel those segaments from the mainland need to take a ferry, but we don't have separate articles because of that. I'm sure there's other examples, but surely you get the point. Furthermore, this page is called the "Pan-American Highway"... singular. The articles for the north and south legs require disambiguation. The content on both is essentially duplicated from the main article, (and vice-versa) or it should be. What's the benefit of having three pages for the same content, when it can all be easily and conveniently covered, and better kept up-to-date, by the single article? What's the downside here? - wolf 06:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

I agree with this proposal, additonally both current articles should be kept as redirects. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

When travelers discuss the Pan American Highway, and when they actually traverse it, it's not considered two separate entities. To reflect user experience and user search intent, merging the two articles makes sense. OurOffbeatLife (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic