Talk:Nmixx

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Paper9oll in topic Timeline
WikiProject iconWomen in Music Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Timeline

@ValenciaThunderbolt, a timeline does not add new information. It summaries information in visual form so why remove it? Lightoil (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

If there were major timeline changes to he group, I'd understand, but the group has only existed since year, with only one member leaving. The tables below show when singles and EPs were released. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Majors timeline changes are not needed for a timeline so a timeline should be kept as for our readers reference. Lightoil (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I stated previously on other article that the true purpose of having a timeline is to show in graphics on desktop the changes in lineup given that it is clearly positioned in the member's section, any other miscellaneous purposes (i.e. addition of album's releases and some even listing single's releases which is absurd) is simply misusing and abusing it. From my understanding and long-term observation, timeline doesn't exists in nearly every single K-pop groups' article previously, article that has timeline are those with multiple lineup changes and even then it sticked to its true purpose and nothing else. I'm not sure who started this nonsense of adding miscellaneous junk into the timeline deriving from its true purpose however what is even absurd is adding unnecessary timeline in article that doesn't requires it. In short, as the MOS always said "better in prose" for minor details (e.g. minor lineup changes) and I believe this applies here. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)