Talk:Nacra Sailing

Sailing Low‑importance

	Nacra Sailing is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

I removed an old comment of mine that was from when I was working on getting this article submitted. It's no longer relevant, except to say I stuck with it, and the Wikipedia reviewers were quite helpful in getting up to an acceptable standard.

Let's move forward on making this a better article. I think the table has been nicely updated by a number of editors, it's looking pretty complete. ZeroXero (talk) 21:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

improving the table

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I see some tables on Wikipedia that have little arrows in the column headers so that you can sort them either high to low or low to high. And there can be several of these.

Our table appears to be random, which I guess is charming in a way, but not every encyclopedic.

So the two approaches I can see would be just to manually reorder it. The column that makes the most sense would be the "Intro Year" column, which would give it an obvious order.

The other candidate would be "Length".

If we went with the style of table where you can resort on the fly using little up and down chevrons in the header, then those are the columns I would make the table sortable on.

ZeroXero (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Add topic