Talk:Moonie (nickname)

(Redirected from Talk:Moonie (Unification Church))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by PopSci in topic Merge?
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2009Articles for deletionKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 5, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the term "Moonie" was first used by American media sources to refer to members of Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church in 1974, during church events at the Madison Square Garden?
WikiProject iconKorea Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJournalism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge?

This article is not really about the word, which would be against WP:Not a dictionary anyway. (Although there are some exceptions to that.) It is really about the controversy in the US about the use of the word in the 70s and 80s. Unification Church of the United States already has a section on that. How about merge there? Steve Dufour (talk) 14:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Hmmm...might be a good idea. Actually the word "Moonie" is used more often for other things now days, like Sailor Moon fans.Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be merged as it is a record of attitudes pertaining at a particular time. It's contents are not adequately reflected in the target page. A rename would be more appropriate.Cathar66 (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)