Talk:Mesembrinella caenozoica

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Redditaddict69 in topic comprised of
WikiProject iconInsects Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCaribbean: Dominican Republic Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Dominican Republic (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconDiptera Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

comprised of

While this isn't policy, I have removed it due to the fact this this phrase can be found almost nowhere on Wikipedia. It is incorrect english.

  • "To comprise" means "to consist of"
  • "To comprise of" would therefore mean "to consist of of"

Language critics have claimed that this usage is wrong for a long time.

Redditaddict69 20:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

It is not incorrect in English. It is only incorrect when the purposely narrow definition that includes "of" is used. Major dictionaries reflect that the "of is not implicit in the meaning, and is often used without it. Giraffedata purposely ignores that fact in his essay on the subject. Do not change it if you are reverted, and I will note you are now very close to 3RR.--Kevmin § 01:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
@Kevmin: I didn't notice the revert when I made the 2nd edit–I'll stop now, sorry. Redditaddict69 05:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)