Talk:Margaret Singer

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nobel Prize nominations

Latest comment: 17 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Nobel Prize nominations are not verifiable. see: [[1]]Repeating statements of Nobel Prize nominations made in the press does not meet the standard of RS. Ratagonia 05:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This has been discussed ad nauseam. Please see prior discussions on this, as well as the actual citations that back up this information. Smee 05:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
- Perhaps friend Smee would enlighten me as to where it has been discussed ad nauseam. Publicists are well-known for claiming Nobel Prize nominations. see section on nominations under Nobel prize. Ratagonia 05:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  - Please see Talk:Margaret Singer/Archive 1. I will add more evidence mometarily. Smee 05:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
  - Talk:Margaret_Singer/Archive_1#Request_for_Comment:_Margaret_Singer_Nobel_Prize_Nominations. Consensus was to keep' the information, with a caveat exactly as it was shown in the article, that is "Was reported to have been nominated..." It should be noted that I had wanted to keep the other multiple citations, but it was thought that one highly reputable citation such as the biography at Thomson Gale was good enough. Smee 05:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Citations

Twice nominated for Nobel Prize for work in Schizophrenia, according to :

Thomson Gale, ^[1]^[2]
Book, They Were Giants^[3]
Statements made by Daniel Goldstine, Ph.D.^[4]
The Guardian, ^[5]
The Los Angeles Times^[6].

Full references and blockquotes of citations

Smee 05:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

- - I stand corrected. My apologies. Ratagonia 05:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    - Thank you. Smee 05:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

adjunct professor emeritus?

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

never hear of an "adjunct professor emeritus" if someone is that highly valued then they are never an adjunct or is this my ignorance? Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

It is quite strange. The term is used frequently in connection with Margaret Singer, even in places that would be unlikely to deliberately slight her. On the other hand, as you say, the term doesn't seem to make sense: Emeritus is usually only awarded to people who have full professor status, and adjunct isn't even tenured. AndroidCat (talk) 07:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

[legal dispute]

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does the Landmark Education legal dispute warrant its own section? We have two paragraphs basically saying that she didn't say Landmark is a cult, that she had no firsthand knowledge of Landmark, and that she wouldn't recommend it. The placement here appears to be overkill. --Tgeairn (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Singer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,972865-9,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Margaret Singer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*1 image, 39 citations. Smee 06:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC).

Last edited at 06:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC).Substituted at 23:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Search