Talk:List of theoretical physicists

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Untitled

We already have List of physicists, which can mention whether a particular physicist is a theoretical one, so this page seems a bit redundant. --Lexor|Talk 00:05, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Jesus?

Should Jesus Christ really be included in this list? I have never heard of any contribution he made to physics...

Stub?

How can you expand an article called "List of theoretical physicists" that already has a list of theoretical physicists?

Brianjd 05:38, 2004 Jun 16 (UTC)

Theoretical physicists in pop culture

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I suggest such a section be created to deal with fictional physicists, such as "Gordon Freeman", who are currently listed with real physicists.--Lord of the Ping 19:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Fictional theoretical physicists - DELETE

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I cannot see this section doing anything but diminishing the genius and exemplary contributions that real people made over the millennia. Just because certain individuals have their whole universe tethered to the popular media, does not justify polluting advanced achievement.

This section should be deleted, or relegated to some popular English media page.

thanks,Baden41.63.140.52 (talk) 10:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I too generally disfavour the idea of fictional scientists in this article. However, we can (could?) include fictional theorists, with the given criteria (See elsewhere on this talk page). Ema--or (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC) PS There is a category page for fictional physicists. Ema--or (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Slang

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Although the popular term, Theoretical Physicists are physicists theoretically, while physics theorists are those who theorise about physics. Why not the distinction? Is confusing confusion not confusing? I think it is slang. ~ R.T.G 18:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think notability criteria should be applied in this article. Otherwise, this may be become a forum for self-promotion, trolling etc. Ema--or (talk) 01:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)PS I also discuss this issue here. Ema--or (talk) 02:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Why does the list stop?

Why are there no theorists listed born after 1977?

Trying to do research in which uni's recent theorists got their PhDs from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sin Stalker (talk • contribs)

Add topic

Search