Talk:Latvian phonology

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

Latvia

	Latvia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

H

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Absence of the phoneme h in Latvian could be mentioned/described somewhere. It is an interesting feature and not so obvious for a reader.--Võrok (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)It could be mentioned also in the main article about Latvian language.--Võrok (talk) 11:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Assimilation: dependence on the syllable(s) to which subsequent consonants belong?

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The current article text contains:

"Voiced and unvoiced consonants assimilate to the subsequent consonant, e.g. apgabals [ˈabɡabals] or labs [ˈlaps]. At the same time single voiced consonants (d, z, g, dz etc.) are not devoiced word-finally: dzied [ˈdzie̯d], dedz [dæd͡z]."

It would follow from this that "t" in "atnāk" would be pronounced "d", and I wonder whether this is true.

Furthermore, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atbild%C4%93t#Latvian shows [atbîldɛː̂t] for "atbildet"; https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atmi%C5%86a#Latvian shows [atmiɲa] for "atmina", and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atvasara#Latvian gives [atvasaɾa] for "atvasara".

If these indications are correct, that would contradict the rule as given in the article. (And there are more such counterexamples on en.wiktionary.org.

Could the answer to the question whether subsequent consonants belong to the same syllable be a determining factor?Redav (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

The voicing assimilation occurs only before obstruents, including heterosyllabic obstruents, but never before sonorants. Sonorants include not only the nasals [m, n], but also <v> [ʋ]. [tb] for <tb> is an error, it must be [db]. 2A02:3032:202:355C:9BB6:92E1:A9E6:861E (talk) 03:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Add topic