Talk:John Jewel

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ltwin in topic Secondary ources needed
WikiProject iconTheology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEngland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Oxford Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChristianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as High-importance).

Secondary ources needed

Sources needed for the sections analyzing Jewel's work!Klasovsky (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. I tagged the article for this because the section on "Jewel's Apology of the Church of England" features unsourced and unverified analysis of his work, while only citing sections of the work itself. This is not how Wikipedia handles primary sources, especially theological works, which can easily be misinterpreted. Analysis and commentary should be based on what reliable sources say. One example is found in the "Sacramental theology" section. It describes his Eucharistic theology as being "somewhere between Luther's consubstantiation and the Roman Catholics' transubstantiation." But the quote from Jewel provided sounds like receptionism, which is much different from both consubstantiation and transubstantiation. Someone with access to scholarship on Jewel's Apology needs to review this article. Ltwin (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)