This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Article is still a stub but notability should be established by extensive works by this author. Guild War references also help to reference. Please discuss here first before reverting notability.Stextc (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I've decided to be bold, I'm afraid - the article has been extensively extended. I think I kept most of the previous work, but I've moved it around a lot. I hope that this is ok - if not, it can always be reverted or rewritten. As an aside, my major problem with the extensive use of notability tags (especially on stubs) is that it tends to lower the quality of the articles: editors need to spend all of their time adding references, rather than developing the content to an acceptable standard (or at least to start class). Thus I figured that this article needed a framework in which to add the references. should add that I removed the notabilty tags - I think Craw-daddy fixed that with the Pyramid references, but either way Sci Fi Weekly, IGN and JS Online should be enough. Bilby (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps - it should come under "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews", if nothing else. Given Jeff's reputation within the field, a combination of body of work, Pyramid (and other) reviews, and common sense may be sufficient too, although I'd be loathe to rely on the common sense argument if I could avoid it. Bilby (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Alternity
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
