Talk:HU-210

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 74.173.115.163 in topic last paragraph copyrighted?
WikiProject iconCannabis Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.

Brain cell growth

The article says "Per a 2005 article in the Journal Of Clinical Investigation, HU-210 actually stimulates cell growth in the brain's hippocampus region, an opposite effect of drugs like alcohol, nicotine, heroin, and cocaine." A web search shows that many popular science outlets seem to suggest that this result implies that cannabis has the same effect. Does anyone know if such a study has been done with cannabis, and if so, what the results were? Cannabis has been around for much longer and it seems like we should already know if it had the effect described, namely stimulating growth of brain cells. A5 13:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

============================================================

HU-210 probably cannot cause death, at least through respiratory paralysis, in spite of its potency, because the appropriate CB1 receptors are not located in brain areas reponsible for control of that function.

CAS and other stuff

The old CAS no was the right one for HU-210, the new one is for HU-211. I changed the article a little bit as it mixed both HU-210 and HU-211. The INN of HU-211 is Dexanabinol and HU-210 is just HU-210.-- Panoramix303 (talk) 00:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Some more updates

The sentence about toxicity was removed because it is purely speculative. The references are in a proper format now.-- Panoramix303 (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

last paragraph copyrighted?

I'd like to point that the last paragraph is taken almost word for word from the march 2009 DEA microgram bulletin. wouldn't that be considered as a copyright infringement?

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/programs/forensicsci/microgram/mg0309/mg0309.html198.103.172.9 (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The US Government does not copyright "Edicts of government": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.173.115.163 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)