WikiProject iconLibraries Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAustria Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconClassical music
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.

Untitled

Isn't his portrayal - A substantial role - In Peter Shaffer's "Amadeus" worthy of inclusion in this article?

I wouldn't argue that his portrayal in Amadeus is "substantial", but I do agree that the portrayal in both stage and film should be noted. So, I added a popular media section today. If van Swieten is a character in any novels or other works, it should be noted in this section. Cheers! Spacini (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Braunbehrens

Owing to the flawed secondary literature that he relied on, Braunbehrens's book is so fraught with errors that it cannot be used as a source for van Swieten's biography.--Suessmayr (talk) 09:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello Suessmayr, I'm sorry to be quarreling with you so often, but I think ad hominem comments like this one are not helpful. The problem as I see it is that you are just an anonymous Wikipedia editor--why should I or other editors give any particular credence to your remarks, when they are weighed against actually-published material?
It would be far more helpful in this context if you would cite a published source that give alternative estimates about Swieten's income. Or, if you really want to advocate the view "Braunbehrens is incompetent, therefore trust him for nothing", then you should be able to cite published material that makes a good case that he is indeed incompetent. Sincerely, Opus33 (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Portrait by Fendi, engraved by Axmann, does not show Gottfried van Swieten.

The second portrait given here as one of Gottfried van Swieten is, in my opinion, that of his father, the famous physician Gerard van Swieten, empress Maria Theresia's personal medical attendant. --Yorick94.219.151.226 (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you -- very interesting. Here is what I was able to find out.
If you click on the image you've questioned, you'll find that it was taken from work by Daniel Heartz, a very experienced scholar. You'll also see that it was printed in a 1914 collection of Mozart's letters edited by Ludwig Schiedermair. If you are correct, we could suppose that it was Schiedermair who originally erred, and that Heartz copied his error without checking.
Further, if you visit the Gerard van Swieten page on the Wikimedia Commons([1]), there is a picture there, labeled as being Gerard, that looks extremely similar to the one under discussion ([2]). The Commons image was taken from a work by a military medical historian, who discussed Gerard van Swieten's views on amputation, etc.
On the basis of this little search, I believe that you are almost certainly right, and we ought to remove the image from this article. However, I propose to delay doing this for a couple of days in case other editors have any comments. Thanks again. Opus33 (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Why bother delaying? Of course it's his father. http://www.bildarchivaustria.at/Bildarchiv//583/B7392403T7392407.jpg 128.232.152.31 (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks to the two of you -- I confess I have been too lazy to do the research myself ... Best, Yorick 94.219.151.226 (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gottfried van Swieten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The article on Gottfried van Swieten states that his father stayed Protestant all of his life, while in the article on Gerard van Swieten it is stated that Gerard remained Catholic. A serious contradiction, i noticed.

The article on Gottfried van Swieten states that his father stayed Protestant all of his life, while in the article on Gerard van Swieten it is stated that Gerard remained Catholic. A serious contradiction, i noticed. 2A02:A420:60:28F3:C021:C28E:6795:CFB1 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: 19th Century Concert Life

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vocalmusicgeek (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jmares3218 (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

"These concerts were first given in one of the palaces of the members or in the large hall of the Imperial Library, "

This is false. The hall of the library was never used for concerts. The concerts always took place in van Swieten's private rooms in the Vienna Hofburg.--Suessmayr (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)