Talk:Employment Relations Act 2000

New Zealand: Politics / Law Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A number of countries (including Britain) have passed "Employment Relations Act" s. The expression should not redirect to the New Zealand Act.Johncmullen1960 (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Compulsory Unionism

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deleted previous addition to Freeloading section

"However, compulsory unionism is incompatible with the right of freedom of association (or non-association) which was one of the rights guaranteed under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990."

Reason: Compulsory unionism is not incompatible with NZ BOR as freedom of association only protects the right to come together with other individuals and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. see:freedom of association. Freedom of association does not protect against enforced association as this would be incompatible with several other areas of common law such as imprisonment and the ability to gather taxes (as it could be argued that being forced to be a NZ citizen would be incompatible). --Adam (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Add topic