Talk:Dandeny Muñoz Mosquera

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Blcklbl in topic The Avianca Flight 203 Bombing
WikiProject iconColombia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers / Organized crime Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconTerrorism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Avianca Flight 203 Bombing

Strength of Evidence

The article had stated that there was no evidence connecting this individual to the Avianca flight 203 bombing. However, Muñoz Mosquera was convicted in a court of law. So, I have changed the article to state that some people (such the author of the previous version of the article) dispute the evidence, rather than a subjective assertion that there was no evidence connecting him to the bombing. The new wording is less biased while still acknowledging the doubt referred to by the previous author.--Blcklbl (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)