Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct, people!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The correct English title of this agreement appears to be the Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services rather than the slightly shorter title currently used by the Taipei Times. Source: http://www.ecfa.org.tw/Download.aspx?No=34&strT=ECFADoc

The agreement was signed in June 2013 but at time of writing (February 2014) has not yet been approved by Taiwan's legislature, the Legislative Yuan. --61.63.34.193 (talk) 10:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Translation

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%A9%E5%B2%B8%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E8%B2%BF%E6%98%93%E5%8D%94%E8%AD%B0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.253.221.79 (talk) 09:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

RfC: Is the writing of this page neutral [multiple points of views]?

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Following recent political event in Taiwan and associated In The News candidacy", it have been STRONGLY asked by ITN's admin to check this article for its tone. Then, the event would be acceptable for ITN. Yug (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

I've done a fairly thorough revision of the article, which I think has removed most of the sins against NPOV. However, to further balance the article, the "Controversy" section needs to be fleshed out with more viewpoints in support of the CSSTA. PortableSun (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Had a quick play through it and it seems pretty neutral to me (made some changes). Unfortunately it looks like it is a bit late for ITN though. AIRcorn (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Add topic