Talk:Crocker Land Expedition

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crocker Land Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625234845/http://entohistory.tamu.edu/hallofhonor/hallofhonor.html to http://entohistory.tamu.edu/hallofhonor/hallofhonor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crocker Land Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827222607/http://www.spurlock.uiuc.edu/collections/browse/crockerland/crockerland_txt.html to http://www.spurlock.uiuc.edu/collections/browse/crockerland/crockerland_txt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

The lead says Peary's sighting is "believed" to be fraudulent, while the Background section says it's "known" to be fraudulent. 64.250.205.81 (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

The statement in the Background section seems to be based on the fact that Crocker Land is not mentioned in Peary's diary during the time he claimed to have discovered it. But "as he wrote in his diary" followed by the claim of fraud sounds like he admitted to the fabrication in his diary (which he did not do).

Perhaps that part should just be removed or further clarification of how the diary shows the claim to be fraudulent should be added (like exists in Peary's BLP). 64.250.205.81 (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

My confusion stemmed from a misreading of the statement. The inclusion of a source at the end of this part of the sentence led me to believe that was the whole claim. "It is now known that Peary's claim is fraudulent, as he wrote in his diary at the time". However the full sentence is "It is now known that Peary's claim is fraudulent, as he wrote in his diary that no land was visible". The placement of the source (I'm guessing) is because the source does not mention the last part, but does mention the diary. But since the source supports the overall claim of fraud, I placed it after "fraudulent" to avoid any confusion in the future. 64.250.205.81 (talk) 22:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)