Talk:Chemical kinetics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
![]() | Chemical and Bio Engineering (inactive) | |||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2019 and 17 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jiali0929.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lamga (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kinetic equations represent a way of describing the time evolution of a system consisting of a large number of particles. Due to the high number of dimensions and their intrinsic physical properties, the construction of numerical methods represents a challenge and requires a careful balance between accuracy and computational complexity.
In the new section Numerical methods, the detailed example given is the simple first-order rate law. However this simple example does not require numerical integration software. As explained in most physical chemistry or chemical kinetics textbooks, the answer is a simple exponential function, and it can be evaluated with a hand calculator or an Excel spreadsheet. I would suggest finding an example which cannot be integrated analytically and which actually requires one of the software programs (or apps) listed. Dirac66 (talk) 03:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Original:Stopped flow methods, which can reduce the mixing time to the order of a millisecond[8][9][10] The stopped flow methods have limitation, for example, we need to consider about the time it takes to mix gases or solutions and are not suitable if the half-life is less than about a hundredth of a second.
Updated:Stopped flow methods, which can reduce the mixing time to the order of a millisecond[8][9][10] The stopped flow methods have limitation, for example, we need to consider the time it takes to mix gases or solutions and are not suitable if the half-life is less than about a hundredth of a second.
Explanation:There is a typo. The word 'about' should not be in this sentence. Storsmellen (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]