Talk:Cartographic censorship

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maps

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is horrible, someone standardize it.74.70.57.209 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

BT Tower

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

BT Tower in London was originally considered "Top Secret". Though it as completed in 1964, it did not appear on maps until after 1993 when its existence was officially "confirmed". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_Tower — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falijah (talk • contribs) 13:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:BIAS issues

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

...and also apparently just wrong. Censorship is in all cases restriction and not psyops, misdirection, or whatever this article is attempting to talk about. India and others mooting punishment for Google Maps carrying detailed imagery of their defenses is censorship. The US, UK, and USSR promoting false information on certain locations on maps isn't. Any of those countries actively penalizing the provision of true information about those locations would be but isn't how the current article is framed.

There's also an obvious US and Western European bias involved in most of the coverage. Certainly things like the different Chinese empires' traditional policies of considering unauthorized possession of detailed maps de facto evidence of treason is the most textbook example of what cartographic censorship actually is. That it's outside the scope of the current article only speaks to how misdirected the current contents are. — LlywelynII 05:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Add topic