Talk:Canicross

Running Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It looks like Cani cross and canicross cover the same ground. Having two separate articles is a form of content forkery. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 00:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

The Interwiki links to Canicross. Imho Cani cross is the better written article. Canicross should be deleted and replaced by a redirect. →213.194.42.100 (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Add topic