Talk:Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit
 | Religious texts (defunct) | |||
| ||||
Pali as BHS
Moving both conflicting views to talk:
Pali could also be considered a form of BHS.[1] Edgerton states that Pali is in essence a Prakrit.[2]
Mitsube (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've put them both back in the article, right next to each other. In accordance with WP policy, it's not for us to decide who's right. Peter jackson (talk) 11:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
BHS as early middle indo-aryan
S.S Misra has argued that buddhist hybrid sanskrit is a misnomer and the language actually is the early form of middle indo aryan or prakrit and not a hybridization of panini's standardized sanskrit into prakrit and also appears in mitanni inscriptions.[1]
Panini Nothing mentioned about Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit
Panini Nothing mentioned about Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. But below content mentioned only about Sanskrit. So this is irrelevant to Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. So I removed them.//Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit writings emerged after the codification, supposedly in the 5-6th century BCE,[1] of Classical Sanskrit by the scholar Pāṇini. His standardization of the language that had evolved from the ancient Vedic came to be known as "Sanskrit", meaning "refined", "completely formed", "put together", or "constructed".//--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 08:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)