Talk:Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Allens in topic GA Review
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Allens (talk · contribs) 00:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hrm. Unfortunately, I would have had to flunk the article on criterion 1a, except that I went through and cleaned up the grammar, etc. I'll have to check on whether copyediting is sufficient involvement to disqualify myself from being the reviewer - I'm consulting with one of the GA reviewer mentors (Arsenikk) right now. Allens (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, looks like I'm OK. Arsenikk did point out a couple problems, namely:
- A lack of accessdates in citations
- Lack of a screenshot (not required but greatly preferable); a single screenshot falls within fair use, although more than one may not
- I'll continue to go over it and other stuff (copyediting its sequel plus the Parliament of Croatia article). Allens (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Still looking at the rest (anything not down as good) - just wanted to put down these to keep track
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References checked (BTW, you seem to be a bit mixed up between "accessdate" and "date" - the former is the date at which someone last accessed the review/whatever, including in order to verify them, while the latter is the date the review/whatever was published, if available); sources appear reliable for the purpose; no OR found.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
"Setting and characters" could use some expansion - the setting appears to be modern-day but with secret superscience or magic, and should be commented on; a bit more detail should be present as to at least some of the other characters."Setting and characters" fixed, good job - I note these could be used as the basis for an expansion to the linked list of characters article. Does not appear overly detailed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Covers major critiques, especially now.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No problems noted.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Checked 6a; good job on finding the developer images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
- All accessdates are added -
Done
- Screenshot added -
Done
- I think I added enough to the "Setting and characters" section. :) --Khanassassin (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted "26/32 + 6 mixed, 0-)", because I think it's kind of unnecessary, and I never seen that added next to the MetaScore... --Khanassassin (talk) 18:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- OK. I thought that it had gotten 0 negative reviews was of interest, but I'm not experienced in the area of video game reviews... Allens (talk) 23:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025